The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A process typology of regional floods
Abstract
We propose a framework for identifying types of causative mechanisms of floods. The types are long‐rain floods, short‐rain floods, flash floods, rain‐on‐snow floods, and snowmelt floods. We adopt a catchment perspective, i.e., the focus is on the catchment state and the atmospheric inputs rather than on atmospheric circulation patterns. We use a combination of a number of process indicators, including the timing of the floods, storm duration, rainfall depths, snowmelt, catchment state, runoff response dynamics, and spatial coherence. On the basis of these indicators and diagnostic regional plots we identify the process types of 11,518 maximum annual flood peaks in 490 Austrian catchments. Forty‐three percent of the flood peaks are long‐rain floods, only 3% are snowmelt floods, and the relative contribution of the types changes with the flood magnitude. There are pronounced spatial patterns in the frequency of flood type occurrence. For example, rain‐on‐snow floods most commonly occur in northern Austria. Runoff coefficients tend to increase with rainfall depth for long‐rain floods but are less dependent of rainfall depth and exhibit much larger scatter for flash floods. All types exhibit seasonal patterns, both in terms of flood magnitudes and catchment altitudes of flood occurrence. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the flood samples stratified by process type decreases with catchment area for most process types with the exception of flash floods for which CV increases with catchment area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Westra, S., Fowler, H. J., Evans, J. P., Alexander, L. V., Berg, P., Johnson, F., Kendon, E. J., Lenderink, G., & Roberts, N. M. (2014) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/2014rg000464 · Cited by 1,533
Changing climate shifts timing of European floods
Blöschl, G., Hall, J., Parajka, J., Perdigão, R. A. P., Merz, B., Arheimer, B., Aronica, G. T., Bilibashi, A., Bonacci, O., Borga, M., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan2506 · Cited by 1,020
Self-citationMarchi, L., Borga, M., Preciso, E., & Gaume, E. (2010) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.017 · Cited by 745
Causes, impacts and patterns of disastrous river floods
Merz, B., Blöschl, G., Vorogushyn, S., Dottori, F., Aerts, J. C. J. H., Bates, P., Bertola, M., Kemter, M., Kreibich, H., Lall, U., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-021-00195-3 · Cited by 732
Self-citationAtmospheric blocking and weather extremes over the Euro-Atlantic sector – a review
Kautz, L.-A., Martius, O., Pfahl, S., Pinto, J. G., Ramos, A. M., Sousa, P. M., & Woollings, T. (2022) · Weather and Climate Dynamics · doi:10.5194/wcd-3-305-2022 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Merz, R., & Blöschl, G.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1737716680
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A process typology of regional floods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2002wr001952
- The paper
- Merz, R., & Blöschl, G. (2003). A process typology of regional floods. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002wr001952
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.