The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A 3‐D model analysis of the slowdown and interannual variability in the methane growth rate from 1988 to 1997
Abstract
Methane has exhibited significant interannual variability with a slowdown in its growth rate beginning in the 1980s. We use a 3‐D chemical transport model accounting for interannually varying emissions, transport, and sinks to analyze trends in CH 4 from 1988 to 1997. Variations in CH 4 sources were based on meteorological and country‐level socioeconomic data. An inverse method was used to optimize the strengths of sources and sinks for a base year, 1994. We present a best‐guess budget along with sensitivity tests. The analysis suggests that the sum of emissions from animals, fossil fuels, landfills, and wastewater estimated using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change default methodology is too high. Recent bottom‐up estimates of the source from rice paddies appear to be too low. Previous top‐down estimates of emissions from wetlands may be a factor of 2 higher than bottom‐up estimates because of possible overestimates of OH. The model captures the general decrease in the CH 4 growth rate observed from 1988 to 1997 and the anomalously low growth rates during 1992–1993. The slowdown in the growth rate is attributed to a combination of slower growth of sources and increases in OH. The economic downturn in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe made a significant contribution to the decrease in the growth rate of emissions. The 1992–1993 anomaly can be explained by fluctuations in wetland emissions and OH after the eruption of Mount Pinatubo. The results suggest that the recent slowdown of CH 4 may be temporary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence for Substantial Variations of Atmospheric Hydroxyl Radicals in the Past Two Decades
Prinn, R. G., Huang, J., Weiss, R. F., Cunnold, D. M., Fraser, P. J., Simmonds, P. G., McCulloch, A., Harth, C., Salameh, P., O'Doherty, S., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058673 · Cited by 695
Biomass of termites and their emissions of methane and carbon dioxide: A global database
Sanderson, M. G. (1996) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/96gb01893 · Cited by 256
Effect of ozone depletion on atmospheric CH4 and CO concentrations
Bekki, S., Law, K. S., & Pyle, J. A. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/371595a0 · Cited by 135
Cited by
Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States
Miller, S. M., Wofsy, S. C., Michalak, A. M., Kort, E. A., Andrews, A. E., Biraud, S. C., Dlugokencky, E. J., Eluszkiewicz, J., Fischer, M. L., Janssens-Maenhout, G., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1314392110 · Cited by 538
Atmospheric methane evolution the last 40 years
Dalsøren, S. B., Myhre, C. L., Myhre, G., Gomez-Pelaez, A. J., Søvde, O. A., Isaksen, I. S. A., Weiss, R. F., & Harth, C. M. (2016) · Atmospheric chemistry and physics · doi:10.5194/acp-16-3099-2016 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J. S., Logan, J. A., McElroy, M. B., Duncan, B. N., Megretskaia, I. A., & Yantosca, R. M.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2004-08-21
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W2144799487
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A 3‐D model analysis of the slowdown and interannual variability in the methane growth rate from 1988 to 1997. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2003gb002180
- The paper
- Wang, J. S., Logan, J. A., McElroy, M. B., Duncan, B. N., Megretskaia, I. A., & Yantosca, R. M. (2004). A 3‐D model analysis of the slowdown and interannual variability in the methane growth rate from 1988 to 1997. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gb002180
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.