Cited by 52Geology and Paleoclimatology ResearchPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsMarine and coastal ecosystems

An end to the “rain ratio” reign?

Open access
Ridgwell, Andy J.·2003·Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems

Abstract

One of the most elegant mechanisms forwarded for late Quaternary atmospheric CO 2 variability concerns the sensitivity of calcium carbonate preservation in deep ocean sediments to the relative delivery rates of calcium carbonate and particulate organic carbon (the CaCO 3:POC “rain ratio”). It was implicitly assumed that any change in the CaCO 3:POC rain ratio of biogenic material produced in the surface ocean will be communicated directly to the sediments. This would allow relatively subtle shifts in ecosystem composition to affect sedimentary CaCO 3 preservation (and thus atmospheric CO 2). However, recent research into the controls on the transport of POC to depth suggests that the rain ratio “seen” by the sediments may instead be buffered against any perturbation occurring at the surface. This casts doubt on the viability of hypotheses envisaging ecological changes as a means of accounting for the observed glacial‐interglacial CO 2 signal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2003gc000512

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The analysis has not included a possible dependence of carbonate rain fluxes on the efficiency of organic matter transport into the deep ocean, which would reduce the predicted impact of CO2-calcification feedback on the sediments.

    “One caveat to this analysis it that we have not included a possible dependence of carbonate rain fluxes on the efficiency of organic matter transport into the deep ocean [Armstrong et al., 2002;Klaas and Archer, 2002], which would reduce our predicted impact of CO 2calcification feedback on the sediments [Ridgwell, 2003].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 52

Authors
Ridgwell, A. J.
Affiliations
University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Ridgwell, Andy J.
Venue
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Published
2003-06
Volume
4
Issue
6
ISSN
1525-2027 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1758831361
Cited by
52
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of East Anglia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
Keywords
deep-sea sediments, particulate organic carbon, carbonate pump, biological carbon pump

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review