The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Source signatures of carbon monoxide and organic functional groups in Asian Pacific Regional Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE‐Asia) submicron aerosol types
Open accessAbstract
Atmospheric submicron particles were collected on Teflon filters downstream of a three‐stage concentrator aboard the National Center for Atmospheric Research C‐130 aircraft near Japan during the Asian Pacific Regional Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE‐Asia). Particle‐phase organic carbon (OC) was quantified using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) transmission spectroscopy. Silicate, carbonate, alkane, alkene, aromatic, alcohol, carbonyl, amine, and organosulfate functional groups were identified and separated with a four‐solvent rinsing procedure. X‐ray fluorescence identified elemental composition. Total OC constructed from FTIR measurements agreed with simultaneous thermal‐optical OC measurements with a slope of 0.91 and an R 2 value of 0.93. OC varied from 0.4 to 14.2 μg m−3, and organic mass varied from 0.6 to 19.6 μg m−3, representing on average 36% of the identified submicron aerosol mass. Measured carbon monoxide (CO) to OC slopes illustrate 10 groups of air from regions described by an Asian emissions inventory. The CO/OC slope is used to compare sources and their influence on organic composition. Fifty‐two percent of ACE‐Asia samples have CO/OC slopes indicative of biomass combustion. Unitless CO/OC slopes above 15 are associated with increased fractions of alcohol groups, unsaturated C‐H groups, and inorganic nitrate. Increased carbonyl carbon fractions in air originating over northern Asia are consistent with secondary OC formation. Case studies in the boundary layer demonstrate that aerosol compositions downwind of large Asian aerosol sources show clear regional composition signatures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The effect of physical and chemical aerosol properties on warm cloud droplet activation
McFiggans, G., Artaxo, P., Baltensperger, U., Coe, H., Facchini, M. C., Feingold, G., Fuzzi, S., Gysel, M., Laaksonen, A., Lohmann, U., et al. (2006) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-6-2593-2006 · Cited by 710
Aerosol Mixing State: Measurements, Modeling, and Impacts
Riemer, N., Ault, A. P., West, M., Craig, R. L., & Curtis, J. H. (2019) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2018rg000615 · Cited by 459
Mass reconstruction methods for PM2.5: a review
Chow, J. C., Lowenthal, D. H., Chen, L.-W. A., Wang, X., & Watson, J. G. (2015) · Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health · doi:10.1007/s11869-015-0338-3 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Maria, S. F., Russell, L. M., Turpin, B. J., Porcja, R. J., Campos, T. L., Weber, R. J., & Huebert, B. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2003-11-21
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- D23
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136085627
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Source signatures of carbon monoxide and organic functional groups in Asian Pacific Regional Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE‐Asia) submicron aerosol types. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2003jd003703
- The paper
- Maria, S. F., Russell, L. M., Turpin, B. J., Porcja, R. J., Campos, T. L., Weber, R. J., & Huebert, B. J. (2003). Source signatures of carbon monoxide and organic functional groups in Asian Pacific Regional Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE‐Asia) submicron aerosol types. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003703
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.