The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Global modeling of heterogeneous chemistry on mineral aerosol surfaces: Influence on tropospheric ozone chemistry and comparison to observations
Open accessAbstract
Mineral aerosols can affect gas phase chemistry in the troposphere by providing reactive sites for heterogeneous reactions. We present here a global modeling study of the influence of mineral dust on the tropospheric photochemical cycle. This work is part of the Mineral Dust and Tropospheric Chemistry (MINATROC) project, which focussed on measurement campaigns, laboratory experiments, and integrative modeling. The laboratory experiments provide uptake coefficients for chemical species on mineral aerosol surfaces, which are used to compute the heterogeneous reaction rates in the model. The field measurements at Mount Cimone, northern Italy, provide trace gas and aerosol measurements during a Saharan dust episode and are used to evaluate the model. The simulations include the reactions between mineral dust aerosols and the gas‐phase species O 3, HNO 3, NO 3, and N 2 O 5. Under the conditions for the year 2000 the model simulates a decrease in global tropospheric ozone mass by about 5% due to the heterogeneous reactions on dust aerosols. The most important heterogeneous reaction is the uptake of HNO 3 on the dust surface, whereby the direct uptake of ozone on dust is not important in atmospheric chemistry. The comparison of the model results to observations indicates that the model simulates well the aerosol mass transported into the Mediterranean during the dust events and the arrival of all major dust events that were observed during a 7 month period. The decrease in ozone concentration during dust events is better simulated by the model when the heterogeneous reactions are included.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global dust model intercomparison in AeroCom phase I
Huneeus, N., Schulz, M., Balkanski, Y., Griesfeller, J., Prospero, J., Kinne, S., Bauer, S., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Dentener, F., et al. (2011) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-11-7781-2011 · Cited by 1,074
Self-citationNighttime radical observations and chemistry
Brown, S. S., & Stutz, J. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs35181a · Cited by 637
Liu, Y., & Wang, T. (2020) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-20-6323-2020 · Cited by 345
Monitoring intense dust storms over the Indian region using satellite data – a case study
Gharai, B., Jose, S., & Mahalakshmi, D. V. (2013) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431161.2013.813655 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Bauer, S. E., Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Hauglustaine, D. A., & Dentener, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2004-01-23
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- D2
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156534742
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global modeling of heterogeneous chemistry on mineral aerosol surfaces: Influence on tropospheric ozone chemistry and comparison to observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2003jd003868
- The paper
- Bauer, S. E., Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Hauglustaine, D. A., & Dentener, F. (2004). Global modeling of heterogeneous chemistry on mineral aerosol surfaces: Influence on tropospheric ozone chemistry and comparison to observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003868
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.