Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transport and freeze‐drying in the tropical tropopause layer

Open access
Jensen, Eric, Pfister, Leonhard·2004·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

We use a Lagrangian, one‐dimensional cloud model to simulate ice cloud formation and dehydration along trajectories in the tropical tropopause layer (TTL). Time‐height curtains of temperature along the trajectory paths are extracted from meteorological analyses. The temperatures are adjusted near the tropopause such that the spatial average cold point temperature matches tropical radiosonde measurements. Temperature perturbations due to Kelvin waves, Rossby gravity waves, and high‐frequency gravity waves are superimposed. The cloud model tracks the growth and sedimentation of individual ice crystals. Ice number densities in the cloud simulations without waves range from <0.001 to ∼0.2 cm−3; when clouds form, they dehydrate the air but generally do not reduce the water vapor mixing ratio down to ice saturation. Wave‐driven temperature perturbations result in higher cloud frequencies and cause higher ice number densities (>1 cm−3) and smaller crystals (1–10 μm radius), resulting in less sedimentation but still effective dehydration overall. Inclusion of wave‐driven temperature oscillations decreases the final TTL H 2 O mixing ratio somewhat primarily because the wave perturbations decrease the tropical average cold point tropopause temperature by ∼0.75 K. Ultimately, air rising through the TTL is effectively dehydrated with or without wave perturbations. In general, the model results suggest that the final water vapor mixing ratios are primarily controlled by the minimum temperatures encountered by parcels and that they are relatively insensitive to factors such as the wave‐driven temperature variability, the supersaturation threshold for ice nucleation, and the rate of ascent through the tropopause layer. However, the frequency and geographical distribution of cloud formation is very sensitive to these parameters. On average, the clouds dehydrate the air along trajectories down to mixing ratios ∼10–40% higher than the temperature minimum saturation mixing ratio. The simulations predict efficient freeze‐drying of air by cloud formation within the TTL: For the December–January 1995/1996 period simulated the average final H 2 O mixing ratios at the tropopause (370–380 K potential temperature) range from 2.5 to 3.2 ppmv. These values are somewhat lower than the estimates of the stratospheric water vapor entry value from satellite and in situ measurements; hence an additional source of water (such as injection by deep convection) may be required to explain the observed tropical tropopause humidity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2003jd004022

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Metadata

Authors
Jensen, E., & Pfister, L.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2004-01-27
Volume
109
Issue
D2
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968812917
Cited by
280
References
33
FWCI
11.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transport and freeze‐drying in the tropical tropopause layer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2003jd004022
The paper
Jensen, E., & Pfister, L. (2004). Transport and freeze‐drying in the tropical tropopause layer. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004022

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.