The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explosive volcanism in the Tharsis region: Global evidence in the Martian geologic record
Abstract
A global equatorial set of layered deposits on Mars has been reexamined with Mars Global Surveyor data. The stratigraphy, morphology, and erosional characteristics of units separated by thousands of kilometers are remarkably similar to each other and consistent with a widespread, episodic, subaerial source of fine‐grained material. This study is the first to propose a genetic link between many units that have traditionally been considered on a local or regional level, including the Medusae Fossae Formation, Valles Marineris interior deposits, chaotic terrain, Terra Meridiani, and Arabia materials. Mapping relationships suggest that all of these units are post‐Noachian in age and formation may have continued until the recent past. Thinning of deposits with increasing distance from the Tharsis rise suggests that much of these materials may be volcanic ash flows and air fall from explosive eruptions in the Tharsis region, analogous to those produced by terrestrial plinian eruptions. Contemporary Martian winds would preferentially transport ash from an eruption plume near Tharsis east or west along the equator depending on the season. Erosion has removed much of the original volcanic ash, and only isolated layered stacks remain, sometimes in topographic depressions that inhibit erosion. Modeling indicates that widespread dispersion of ash after an eruption is easily attainable in present or past atmospheric conditions, consistent with the hypothesis that the far‐reaching deposits may be composed of ash from past explosive eruptions in the vicinity of Tharsis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cratering Chronology and the Evolution of Mars
Hartmann, W. K., & Neukum, G. (2001) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1023/a:1011945222010 · Cited by 909
Carr, M. H. (1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195099386.001.0001 · Cited by 551
Cited by
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter's High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE)
McEwen, A. S., Eliason, E. M., Bergstrom, J. W., Bridges, N. T., Hansen, C. J., Delamere, W. A., Grant, J. A., Gulick, V. C., Herkenhoff, K. E., Keszthelyi, L., et al. (2007) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/2005je002605 · Cited by 1,739
Geologic map of the northern plains of Mars
Tanaka, K. L., Skinner, J. A., & Hare, T. M. (2005) · Scientific Investigations Map · doi:10.3133/sim2888 · Cited by 362
Evidence of Ice‐Rich Layered Deposits in the Medusae Fossae Formation of Mars
Watters, T. R., Campbell, B. A., Leuschen, C. J., Morgan, G. A., Cicchetti, A., Orosei, R., & Plaut, J. J. (2024) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2023gl105490 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Hynek, B. M., Phillips, R. J., & Arvidson, R. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- E9
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021212155
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explosive volcanism in the Tharsis region: Global evidence in the Martian geologic record. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2003je002062
- The paper
- Hynek, B. M., Phillips, R. J., & Arvidson, R. E. (2003). Explosive volcanism in the Tharsis region: Global evidence in the Martian geologic record. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003je002062
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.