The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of effective and efficient rainfall‐runoff models using integration of deterministic, real‐coded genetic algorithms and artificial neural network techniques
Abstract
Many researchers have reported about the problems in modeling low‐magnitude flows while developing artificial neural network (ANN) rainfall‐runoff models trained using popular back propagation (BP) method and have suggested the use of alternative training methods. This paper presents the results of a new approach employing real‐coded genetic algorithms (GAs) to train ANN rainfall‐runoff models, which are able to overcome such problems. The paper also presents a new class of models termed gray box models that integrate deterministic and ANN techniques for hydrologic modeling. Daily rainfall and streamflow data from the Kentucky River watershed were employed to test the new approach. Many standard statistical measures were employed to assess and compare various models investigated. The results obtained in this study demonstrate that ANN rainfall‐runoff models trained using real‐coded GA are able to predict daily flow more accurately than the ANN rainfall‐runoff models trained using BP method. The proposed approach of training ANN models using real‐coded GA can significantly improve the estimation accuracy of the low‐magnitude flows. It was found that the gray box models that are capable of exploiting the advantages of both deterministic and ANN techniques perform better than the purely black box type ANN rainfall‐runoff models. A partitioning analysis of results is needed to evaluate the performance of various models in terms of their efficiency in modeling and effectiveness in accurately predicting varying magnitude flows (low, medium, and high flows).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Cited by
Maier, H. R., Jain, A., Dandy, G. C., & Sudheer, K. P. (2010) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.02.003 · Cited by 871
Self-citationA review of advances in flash flood forecasting
Hapuarachchi, H. A. P., Wang, Q. J., & Pagano, T. C. (2011) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.8040 · Cited by 560
Prediction of rainfall time series using modular soft computingmethods
Wu, C. L., & Chau, K. W. (2013) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2012.05.023 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Jain, A., & Srinivasulu, S.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1834484028
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of effective and efficient rainfall‐runoff models using integration of deterministic, real‐coded genetic algorithms and artificial neural network techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2003wr002355
- The paper
- Jain, A., & Srinivasulu, S. (2004). Development of effective and efficient rainfall‐runoff models using integration of deterministic, real‐coded genetic algorithms and artificial neural network techniques. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003wr002355
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.