The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detecting fluid signals in seismicity data through statistical earthquake modeling
Open accessAbstract
According to the well‐known Coulomb failure criterion the variation of either stress or pore pressure can result in earthquake rupture. Aftershock sequences characterized by the Omori law are often assumed to be the consequence of varying stress, whereas earthquake swarms are thought to be triggered by fluid intrusions. The role of stress triggering can be analyzed by modeling solely three‐dimensional (3‐D) elastic stress changes in the crust, but fluid flows which initiate seismicity cannot be investigated without considering complex seismicity patterns resulting from both pore pressure variations and earthquake‐connected stress field changes. We show that the epidemic‐type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model is an appropriate tool to extract the primary fluid signal from such complex seismicity patterns. We analyze a large earthquake swarm that occurred in 2000 in Vogtland/NW Bohemia, central Europe. By fitting the stochastic ETAS model, we find that stress triggering is dominant in creating the observed seismicity patterns and explains the observed fractal interevent time distribution. External forcing, identified with pore pressure changes due to fluid intrusion, is found to directly trigger only a few percent of the total activity. However, temporal deconvolution indicates that a pronounced fluid signal initiated the swarm. These results are confirmed by our analogous investigation of model simulations in which earthquakes are triggered by fluid intrusion as well as stress transfers on a fault plane embedded in a 3‐D elastic half‐space. The deconvolution procedure based on the ETAS model is able to reveal the underlying pore pressure variations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
The mechanics of earthquakes and faulting
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-1579 · Cited by 3,569
Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space
Okada, Y. (1992) · Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America · doi:10.1785/bssa0820021018 · Cited by 3,448
Slip instability and state variable friction laws
Ruina, A. (1983) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb088ib12p10359 · Cited by 3,280
The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting
Scholz, C. H. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818516 · Cited by 2,515
Statistical Models for Earthquake Occurrences and Residual Analysis for Point Processes
Ogata, Y. (1988) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1988.10478560 · Cited by 2,311
Self-citationScholz, C. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/34097 · Cited by 2,227
The role of stress transfer in earthquake occurrence
Stein, R. S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/45144 · Cited by 1,745
The Centenary of the Omori Formula for a Decay Law of Aftershock Activity.
Utsu, T., Ogata, Y., S, R., & Matsu'ura (1995) · Journal of Physics of the Earth · doi:10.4294/jpe1952.43.1 · Cited by 1,413
Self-citationSpace-Time Point-Process Models for Earthquake Occurrences
Ogata, Y. (1998) · Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics · doi:10.1023/a:1003403601725 · Cited by 1,260
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hainzl, S., & Ogata, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2005-03-04
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- B5
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086249868
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 11.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting fluid signals in seismicity data through statistical earthquake modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004jb003247
- The paper
- Hainzl, S., & Ogata, Y. (2005). Detecting fluid signals in seismicity data through statistical earthquake modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jb003247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.