Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 402

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Direct measurements of ocean surface velocity from space: Interpretation and validation

Open access
Chapron, Bertrand, Collard, Fabrice, Ardhuin, Fabrice·2005·Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Abstract

The median Doppler shift of radar echoes is analyzed in measurements by ENVISAT's Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (ASAR) over the ocean. This Doppler centroid differs from a predicted signal based on the predicted motion of the satellite and Earth. This anomaly, converted to a surface Doppler velocity UD, appears to be of geophysical origin. Two wide‐swath images over the Gulf Stream around Cape Hatteras suggest that UD contains high‐resolution information on surface currents, while on a global scale, UD is found to vary with the wind speed in the range direction. A simple quantitative forward model is proposed, based on a practical two‐scale decomposition of the surface geometry and kinematics. The model represents the effect of the wind through the wave spectrum, and gives UD ≈ γ U10∥ + Uc∥, with U10∥ and Uc∥ as the 10 m wind speed and quasi‐Eulerian current in the line of sight of the radar projected on the sea surface, respectively, and γ as a coefficient function of the wind speed, wave development, and radar geometry. It is found that for an incidence angle of 23°, γ ≈ 0.3 for moderate winds and fully developed seas. This model is validated with a global data set of ASAR Wave Mode observations, with colocated model winds, acquired over the global ocean during the years 2003 and 2004. The Doppler signal therefore provides the signed parameter UD that can be used to reduce the wind direction ambiguity in the inversion of high‐resolution wind fields from SAR imagery. A qualitative validation of current effects is shown for the English Channel where tidal currents dominate. Thus it should be possible to combine this previously ignored geophysical Doppler signal with traditional information on sea surface roughness, in order to provide very high resolution wind and current fields.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2004jc002809

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 402

Metadata

Authors
Chapron, B., Collard, F., & Ardhuin, F.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Published
2005-07
Volume
110
Issue
C7
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121271591
Cited by
402
References
0
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct measurements of ocean surface velocity from space: Interpretation and validation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004jc002809
The paper
Chapron, B., Collard, F., & Ardhuin, F. (2005). Direct measurements of ocean surface velocity from space: Interpretation and validation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jc002809

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.