The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Direct measurements of ocean surface velocity from space: Interpretation and validation
Open accessAbstract
The median Doppler shift of radar echoes is analyzed in measurements by ENVISAT's Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (ASAR) over the ocean. This Doppler centroid differs from a predicted signal based on the predicted motion of the satellite and Earth. This anomaly, converted to a surface Doppler velocity UD, appears to be of geophysical origin. Two wide‐swath images over the Gulf Stream around Cape Hatteras suggest that UD contains high‐resolution information on surface currents, while on a global scale, UD is found to vary with the wind speed in the range direction. A simple quantitative forward model is proposed, based on a practical two‐scale decomposition of the surface geometry and kinematics. The model represents the effect of the wind through the wave spectrum, and gives UD ≈ γ U10∥ + Uc∥, with U10∥ and Uc∥ as the 10 m wind speed and quasi‐Eulerian current in the line of sight of the radar projected on the sea surface, respectively, and γ as a coefficient function of the wind speed, wave development, and radar geometry. It is found that for an incidence angle of 23°, γ ≈ 0.3 for moderate winds and fully developed seas. This model is validated with a global data set of ASAR Wave Mode observations, with colocated model winds, acquired over the global ocean during the years 2003 and 2004. The Doppler signal therefore provides the signed parameter UD that can be used to reduce the wind direction ambiguity in the inversion of high‐resolution wind fields from SAR imagery. A qualitative validation of current effects is shown for the English Channel where tidal currents dominate. Thus it should be possible to combine this previously ignored geophysical Doppler signal with traditional information on sea surface roughness, in order to provide very high resolution wind and current fields.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The physical oceanography of the transport of floating marine debris
van Sebille, E., Aliani, S., Law, K. L., Maximenko, N., Alsina, J. M., Bagaev, A., Bergmann, M., Chapron, B., Chubarenko, I., Cózar, A., et al. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab6d7d · Cited by 982
Self-citationDistributed sensing of microseisms and teleseisms with submarine dark fibers
Williams, E. F., Fernández-Ruiz, M. R., Magalhaes, R., Vanthillo, R., Zhan, Z., González-Herráez, M., & Martins, H. F. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13262-7 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Chapron, B., Collard, F., & Ardhuin, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- C7
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121271591
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct measurements of ocean surface velocity from space: Interpretation and validation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004jc002809
- The paper
- Chapron, B., Collard, F., & Ardhuin, F. (2005). Direct measurements of ocean surface velocity from space: Interpretation and validation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jc002809
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.