Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 227

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Estimates of atmospheric‐processed soluble iron from observations and a global mineral aerosol model: Biogeochemical implications

Open access
Hand, J. L., Mahowald, N. M., Chen, Y., Siefert, R. L., Luo, C., Subramaniam, A., Fung, I.·2004·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Desert dust deposition to the ocean may be a significant source of biogeochemically important elements, specifically iron. The bioavailability of iron in the oceans requires it to be in a soluble form, and because atmospheric iron in desert dust is typically insoluble, understanding the atmospheric processes that convert insoluble iron to more soluble forms is essential. Understanding these relationships is especially important in remote ocean regions where iron may be the limiting nutrient. Observations of soluble iron from 2001 cruise‐based aerosol measurements over the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans ranged from 0 to 45% (mean of 4 ± 9%) in the fine mode (<2.5 μm in diameter) and 0 to 87% (mean of 2 ± 10%) in the coarse mode. We test two simple hypotheses of soluble iron enhancement in the atmosphere using a global model of mineral aerosols. The first method assumes that iron solubility increases as iron is exposed to solar radiation, approximating photoreduction reactions that are important pathways for enhancement of soluble iron in the presence of acidic solutions. The second process imitates cloud processing of iron by increasing the amount of soluble iron when the mineral aerosol comes into contact with a cloud. Both methods resulted in similar average magnitudes of percent soluble iron compared to observations but did not capture specific events or have sufficient variability, perhaps because the model does not include aerosol interactions between species other than mineral dust or other processes that may be important.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2004jd004574

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 227

Metadata

Authors
Hand, J. L., Mahowald, N. M., Chen, Y., Siefert, R. L., Luo, C., Subramaniam, A., & Fung, I.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2004-09-08
Volume
109
Issue
D17
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990273669
Cited by
227
References
1
FWCI
10.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimates of atmospheric‐processed soluble iron from observations and a global mineral aerosol model: Biogeochemical implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004jd004574
The paper
Hand, J. L., Mahowald, N. M., Chen, Y., Siefert, R. L., Luo, C., Subramaniam, A., & Fung, I. (2004). Estimates of atmospheric‐processed soluble iron from observations and a global mineral aerosol model: Biogeochemical implications. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004574

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.