The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
North American pollution outflow and the trapping of convectively lifted pollution by upper‐level anticyclone
Open accessAbstract
We examine the major outflow pathways for North American pollution to the Atlantic in summer by conducting a 4‐year simulation with the GEOS‐CHEM global chemical transport model, including a coupled ozone‐aerosol simulation with 1° × 1° horizontal resolution for summer 2000. The outflow is driven principally by cyclones tracking eastward across North America at 45–55°N, every 5 days on average. Anthropogenic and fire effluents from western North America are mostly transported north and east, eventually merging with the eastern U.S. pollution outflow to the Atlantic. A semipermanent upper‐level anticyclone traps the convective outflow and allows it to age in the upper troposphere over the United States for several days. Rapid ozone production takes place in this outflow, driven in part by anthropogenic and lightning NOx and in part by HOx radicals produced from convectively lifted CH 2 O that originates from biogenic isoprene. This mechanism could explain ozonesonde observations of elevated ozone in the upper troposphere over the southeastern United States. Asian and European pollution influences in the North American outflow to the Atlantic are found to be dispersed into the background and do not generate distinct plumes. Satellite observations of CO columns from MOPITT and of aerosol optical depths (AODs) from MODIS provide useful mapping of outflow events, despite their restriction to clear‐sky scenes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The influence of Canadian forest fires on pollutant concentrations in the United States.
Wotawa, G., & Trainer, M. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5464.324 · Cited by 286
Chemistry of HOx radicals in the upper troposphere
Jaeglé, L. (2001) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00376-9 · Cited by 217
Cited by
Effect of climate change on air quality
Jacob, D. J., & Winner, D. A. (2009) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.051 · Cited by 1,979
Self-citationWhy do models overestimate surface ozone in the Southeast United States?
Travis, K. R., Jacob, D. J., Fisher, J. A., Kim, P. S., Marais, E. A., Zhu, L., Yu, K., Miller, C. C., Yantosca, R. M., Sulprizio, M. P., et al. (2016) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-16-13561-2016 · Cited by 470
Self-citationRandel, W. J., & Park, M. (2006) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jd006490 · Cited by 398
Park, M., Randel, W. J., Gettelman, A., Massie, S. T., & Jiang, J. H. (2007) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2006jd008294 · Cited by 364
Effects of 2000–2050 global change on ozone air quality in the United States
Wu, S., Mickley, L. J., Leibensperger, E. M., Jacob, D. J., Rind, D., & Streets, D. G. (2008) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2007jd008917 · Cited by 272
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Q., Jacob, D. J., Park, R., Wang, Y., Heald, C. L., Hudman, R., Yantosca, R. M., Martin, R. V., & Evans, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2005-05-17
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- D10
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158945800
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: North American pollution outflow and the trapping of convectively lifted pollution by upper‐level anticyclone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004jd005039
- The paper
- Li, Q., Jacob, D. J., Park, R., Wang, Y., Heald, C. L., Hudman, R., Yantosca, R. M., Martin, R. V., & Evans, M. (2005). North American pollution outflow and the trapping of convectively lifted pollution by upper‐level anticyclone. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.