The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A nested grid formulation for chemical transport over Asia: Applications to CO
Open accessAbstract
A global three‐dimensional chemical transport model (GEOS‐CHEM) was modified to permit treatment of a limited spatial regime with resolution higher than that adopted for the global background. Identified as a one‐way nested grid formulation, the model was applied to a simulation of CO over Asia during spring 2001. Differences between results obtained using the nested grid (resolution 1° × 1°), the coarse global model (resolution 4° × 5°), and the intermediate global model (resolution 2° × 2.5°) are discussed. The higher‐resolution model allows for more efficient, advection‐related, ventilation of the lower atmosphere, reflecting the significance of localized regions of intense upward motion not resolved in a coarser‐resolution simulation. Budget analysis suggests that upward transfer to higher altitudes through large‐scale advection provides the major sink for CO below 4 km. Horizontal advection, mainly through the north boundary, contributes a net source of CO to the window domain despite the polluted nature of the study region. The nested‐grid model is shown to provide good agreement with measurements made during the Transport and Chemical Evolution over the Pacific (TRACE‐P) campaign in spring 2001, notably better than the low‐resolution model in simulating frontal lifting process and differences across the boundary separating the regions of cyclonic and anticyclonic flow. The high‐resolution window approach also allows us to differentiate transport mechanisms for individual subregions of China on a much finer scale than was possible previously. Suggestions are made as to how to allow for subgrid vertical advective motions in the low‐resolution model through a carefully designed and broadly tested eddy diffusion treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Estimating ground‐level PM2.5 using aerosol optical depth determined from satellite remote sensing
van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., & Park, R. J. (2006) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jd006996 · Cited by 537
Young, P. J., Naik, V., Fiore, A. M., Gaudel, A., Guo, J., Lin, M. Y., Neu, J. L., Parrish, D. D., Rieder, H. E., Schnell, J. L., et al. (2018) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.265 · Cited by 444
Atmospheric peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN): A global budget and source attribution
Fischer, E. V., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Sulprizio, M. P., Millet, D. B., Mao, J., Paulot, F., Singh, H. B., Roiger, A., Ries, L., et al. (2014) · Atmospheric chemistry and physics · doi:10.5194/acp-14-2679-2014 · Cited by 390
Self-citationShah, V., Jacob, D. J., Li, K., Silvern, R. F., Zhai, S., Liu, M., Lin, J., & Zhang, Q. (2020) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-20-1483-2020 · Cited by 298
Self-citationSatellite-based estimates of decline and rebound in China’s CO 2 emissions during COVID-19 pandemic
Zheng, B., Geng, G., Ciais, P., Davis, S. J., Martin, R. V., Meng, J., Wu, N., Chevallier, F., Broquet, G., Boersma, F., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd4998 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y. X., McElroy, M. B., Jacob, D. J., & Yantosca, R. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2004-11-24
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- D22
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116829255
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A nested grid formulation for chemical transport over Asia: Applications to CO. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004jd005237
- The paper
- Wang, Y. X., McElroy, M. B., Jacob, D. J., & Yantosca, R. M. (2004). A nested grid formulation for chemical transport over Asia: Applications to CO. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005237
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.