The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vegetation‐modulated landscape evolution: Effects of vegetation on landscape processes, drainage density, and topography
Open accessAbstract
Topography acts as a template for numerous landscape processes that include hydrologic, ecologic, and biologic phenomena. These processes not only interact with each other but also contribute to shaping the landscape as they influence geomorphic processes. We have investigated the effects of vegetation on thresholds for channel initiation and landform evolution using both analytical and numerical approaches. Vegetation is assumed to form a uniform ground cover. Runoff erosion is modeled based on a power function of excess shear stress, in which shear stress efficiency is inversely proportional to vegetation cover. This approach is validated using data. Plant effect on slope stability is represented by additional cohesion provided by plant roots. Vegetation cover is assumed to reduce sediment transport rates due to physical creep processes (rainsplash, dry ravel, and expansion and contraction of sediments) according to a negative exponential relationship. Vegetation grows as a function of both available cover and unoccupied space by plants and is killed by geomorphic disturbances (runoff erosion and landsliding) and wildfires. Analytical results suggest that in an equilibrium basin with a fixed vegetation cover, plants may cause a transition in the dominant erosion process at the channel head. A runoff erosion–dominated landscape, under none or poor vegetation cover, may become landslide dominated under a denser vegetation cover. The sign of the predicted relationship between drainage density and vegetation cover depends on the relative influence of vegetation on different erosion phenomena. With model parameter values representative of the Oregon Coast Range (OCR), numerical experiments conducted using the Channel Hillslope Integrated Landscape Development (CHILD) model confirm the findings based on the analytical theory. A highly dissected fluvial landscape emerges when surface is assumed bare. When vegetation cover is modeled, landscape relief increases, resulting in hollow erosion dominated by landsliding. Interestingly, our simulations underscore the importance of vegetation disturbances by geomorphic events and wildfires on the landscape structure. Simulated landscapes resemble real‐world catchments in the OCR when such disturbances are considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
HORTON, R. E. (1945) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1945)56[275:edosat]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 6,221
Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control
Levins, R. (1969) · Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1093/besa/15.3.237 · Cited by 3,474
Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats
Tilman, D. (1994) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939377 · Cited by 2,780
A monograph on sediment transport in alluvial streams
Engelund, F., & Hansen, E. H. (1967) · Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) · Cited by 1,437
Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation
Nepf, H. M. (1999) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/1998wr900069 · Cited by 1,345
A detachment‐limited model of drainage basin evolution
Howard, A. D. (1994) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/94wr00757 · Cited by 1,255
Spatial variability of field-measured soil-water properties
Nielsen, D. R., Biggar, J. W., & Erh, K. T. (1973) · Hilgardia · doi:10.3733/hilg.v42n07p215 · Cited by 1,080
Yield of sediment in relation to mean annual precipitation
(1958) · Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union · doi:10.1029/tr039i006p01076 · Cited by 1,030
Laio, F., Porporato, A., Ridolfi, L., & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (2001) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/s0309-1708(01)00005-7 · Cited by 929
HOWARD, A. D., & KERBY, G. (1983) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1983)94<739:ccib>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 925
Cited by
Davies, N. S., & Gibling, M. R. (2010) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.11.002 · Cited by 337
Dahl, T. W., & Arens, S. K. M. (2020) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119665 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Istanbulluoglu, E., & Bras, R. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- F2
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966744680
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 5.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vegetation‐modulated landscape evolution: Effects of vegetation on landscape processes, drainage density, and topography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004jf000249
- The paper
- Istanbulluoglu, E., & Bras, R. L. (2005). Vegetation‐modulated landscape evolution: Effects of vegetation on landscape processes, drainage density, and topography. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jf000249
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.