The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model states and parameters: Sequential data assimilation using the particle filter
Open accessAbstract
Two elementary issues in contemporary Earth system science and engineering are (1) the specification of model parameter values which characterize a system and (2) the estimation of state variables which express the system dynamic. This paper explores a novel sequential hydrologic data assimilation approach for estimating model parameters and state variables using particle filters (PFs). PFs have their origin in Bayesian estimation. Methods for batch calibration, despite major recent advances, appear to lack the flexibility required to treat uncertainties in the current system as new information is received. Methods based on sequential Bayesian estimation seem better able to take advantage of the temporal organization and structure of information, so that better compliance of the model output with observations can be achieved. Such methods provide platforms for improved uncertainty assessment and estimation of hydrologic model components, by providing more complete and accurate representations of the forecast and analysis probability distributions. This paper introduces particle filtering as a sequential Bayesian filtering having features that represent the full probability distribution of predictive uncertainties. Particle filters have, so far, generally been used to recursively estimate the posterior distribution of the model state; this paper investigates their applicability to the approximation of the posterior distribution of parameters. The capability and usefulness of particle filters for adaptive inference of the joint posterior distribution of the parameters and state variables are illustrated via two case studies using a parsimonious conceptual hydrologic model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems
Kalman, R. E. (1960) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3662552 · Cited by 31,751
Evensen, G. (1994) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/94jc00572 · Cited by 5,371
A practical Bayesian framework for backpropagation networks
MacKay, D. J. C. (1992) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.3.448 · Cited by 2,917
Cited by
Reverse osmosis desalination: Water sources, technology, and today's challenges
Greenlee, L. F., Lawler, D. F., Freeman, B. D., Marrot, B., & Moulin, P. (2009) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.03.010 · Cited by 3,409
Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China
Yang, J., Reichert, P., Abbaspour, K. C., Xia, J., & Yang, H. (2008) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.012 · Cited by 800
Ajami, N. K., Duan, Q., & Sorooshian, S. (2007) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2005wr004745 · Cited by 597
Self-citationTowards a comprehensive assessment of model structural adequacy
Gupta, H. V., Clark, M. P., Vrugt, J. A., Abramowitz, G., & Ye, M. (2012) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2011wr011044 · Cited by 466
Self-citationAppraisal of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method
Stedinger, J. R., Vogel, R. M., Lee, S. U., & Batchelder, R. (2008) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2008wr006822 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Moradkhani, H., Hsu, K., Gupta, H., & Sorooshian, S.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1761851204
- Cited by
- 777
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model states and parameters: Sequential data assimilation using the particle filter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004wr003604
- The paper
- Moradkhani, H., Hsu, K., Gupta, H., & Sorooshian, S. (2005). Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model states and parameters: Sequential data assimilation using the particle filter. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004wr003604
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.