Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 777

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model states and parameters: Sequential data assimilation using the particle filter

Open access
Moradkhani, Hamid, Hsu, Kuo‐Lin, Gupta, Hoshin, Sorooshian, Soroosh·2005·Water Resources Research

Abstract

Two elementary issues in contemporary Earth system science and engineering are (1) the specification of model parameter values which characterize a system and (2) the estimation of state variables which express the system dynamic. This paper explores a novel sequential hydrologic data assimilation approach for estimating model parameters and state variables using particle filters (PFs). PFs have their origin in Bayesian estimation. Methods for batch calibration, despite major recent advances, appear to lack the flexibility required to treat uncertainties in the current system as new information is received. Methods based on sequential Bayesian estimation seem better able to take advantage of the temporal organization and structure of information, so that better compliance of the model output with observations can be achieved. Such methods provide platforms for improved uncertainty assessment and estimation of hydrologic model components, by providing more complete and accurate representations of the forecast and analysis probability distributions. This paper introduces particle filtering as a sequential Bayesian filtering having features that represent the full probability distribution of predictive uncertainties. Particle filters have, so far, generally been used to recursively estimate the posterior distribution of the model state; this paper investigates their applicability to the approximation of the posterior distribution of parameters. The capability and usefulness of particle filters for adaptive inference of the joint posterior distribution of the parameters and state variables are illustrated via two case studies using a parsimonious conceptual hydrologic model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2004wr003604

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 777

Metadata

Authors
Moradkhani, H., Hsu, K., Gupta, H., & Sorooshian, S.
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
2005-05
Volume
41
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7973
OpenAlex
W1761851204
Cited by
777
References
3
FWCI
20.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model states and parameters: Sequential data assimilation using the particle filter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004wr003604
The paper
Moradkhani, H., Hsu, K., Gupta, H., & Sorooshian, S. (2005). Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model states and parameters: Sequential data assimilation using the particle filter. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004wr003604

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.