Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 402

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Species‐specific responses of calcifying algae to changing seawater carbonate chemistry

Open access
Langer, Gerald, Geisen, Markus, Baumann, Karl‐Heinz, Kläs, Jessica, Riebesell, Ulf, Thoms, Silke, Young, Jeremy R.·2006·Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems

Abstract

Uptake of half of the fossil fuel CO 2 into the ocean causes gradual seawater acidification. This has been shown to slow down calcification of major calcifying groups, such as corals, foraminifera, and coccolithophores. Here we show that two of the most productive marine calcifying species, the coccolithophores Coccolithus pelagicus and Calcidiscus leptoporus, do not follow the CO 2‐related calcification response previously found. In batch culture experiments, particulate inorganic carbon (PIC) of C. leptoporus changes with increasing CO 2 concentration in a nonlinear relationship. A PIC optimum curve is obtained, with a maximum value at present‐day surface ocean pCO 2 levels (∼360 ppm CO 2). With particulate organic carbon (POC) remaining constant over the range of CO 2 concentrations, the PIC/POC ratio also shows an optimum curve. In the C. pelagicus cultures, neither PIC nor POC changes significantly over the CO 2 range tested, yielding a stable PIC/POC ratio. Since growth rate in both species did not change with pCO 2, POC and PIC production show the same pattern as POC and PIC. The two investigated species respond differently to changes in the seawater carbonate chemistry, highlighting the need to consider species‐specific effects when evaluating whole ecosystem responses. Changes of calcification rate (PIC production) were highly correlated to changes in coccolith morphology. Since our experimental results suggest altered coccolith morphology (at least in the case of C. leptoporus) in the geological past, coccoliths originating from sedimentary records of periods with different CO 2 levels were analyzed. Analysis of sediment samples was performed on six cores obtained from locations well above the lysocline and covering a range of latitudes throughout the Atlantic Ocean. Scanning electron micrograph analysis of coccolith morphologies did not reveal any evidence for significant numbers of incomplete or malformed coccoliths of C. pelagicus and C. leptoporus in last glacial maximum and Holocene sediments. The discrepancy between experimental and geological results might be explained by adaptation to changing carbonate chemistry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2005gc001227

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 402

Metadata

Authors
Langer, G., Geisen, M., Baumann, K., Kläs, J., Riebesell, U., Thoms, S., & Young, J. R.
Venue
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Published
2006-09
Volume
7
Issue
9
ISSN
1525-2027 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148461002
Cited by
402
References
2
FWCI
19.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Species‐specific responses of calcifying algae to changing seawater carbonate chemistry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2005gc001227
The paper
Langer, G., Geisen, M., Baumann, K., Kläs, J., Riebesell, U., Thoms, S., & Young, J. R. (2006). Species‐specific responses of calcifying algae to changing seawater carbonate chemistry. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005gc001227

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.