Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,508

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Post‐processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data

Open access
Swenson, Sean, Wahr, John·2006·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

Gravity fields produced by the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission require smoothing to reduce the effects of errors present in short wavelength components. As the smoothing radius decreases, these errors manifest themselves in maps of surface mass variability as long, linear features generally oriented north to south (i.e., stripes). The presence of stripes implies correlations in the gravity field coefficients. Here we examine the spectral signature of these correlated errors, and present a method to remove them. Finally, we apply the filter to a model of surface‐mass variability to show that the filter has relatively little degradation of the underlying geophysical signals we seek to recover.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2005gl025285

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Swenson, S., & Wahr, J.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2006-04
Volume
33
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2060576920
Cited by
1,508
References
0
FWCI
27.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.