The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement site atmospheric state best estimates for Atmospheric Infrared Sounder temperature and water vapor retrieval validation
Open accessAbstract
The Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) is the first of a new generation of advanced satellite‐based atmospheric sounders with the capability of obtaining high–vertical resolution profiles of temperature and water vapor. The high‐accuracy retrieval goals of AIRS (e.g., 1 K RMS in 1 km layers below 100 mbar for air temperature, 10% RMS in 2 km layers below 100 mbar for water vapor concentration), combined with the large temporal and spatial variability of the atmosphere and difficulties in making accurate measurements of the atmospheric state, necessitate careful and detailed validation using well‐characterized ground‐based sites. As part of ongoing AIRS Science Team efforts and a collaborative effort between the NASA Earth Observing System (EOS) project and the Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program, data from various ARM and other observations are used to create best estimates of the atmospheric state at the Aqua overpass times. The resulting validation data set is an ensemble of temperature and water vapor profiles created from radiosondes launched at the approximate Aqua overpass times, interpolated to the exact overpass time using time continuous ground‐based profiles, adjusted to account for spatial gradients within the Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU) footprints, and supplemented with limited cloud observations. Estimates of the spectral surface infrared emissivity and local skin temperatures are also constructed. Relying on the developed ARM infrastructure and previous and ongoing characterization studies of the ARM measurements, the data set provides a good combination of statistics and accuracy which is essential for assessment of the advanced sounder products. Combined with the collocated AIRS observations, the products are being used to study observed minus calculated AIRS spectra, aimed at evaluation of the AIRS forward radiative transfer model, AIRS observed radiances, and temperature and water vapor profile retrievals. This paper provides an introduction to the ARM site best estimate validation products and characterizes the accuracy of the AIRS team version 4 atmospheric temperature and water vapor retrievals using the ARM products. The AIRS retrievals over tropical ocean are found to have very good accuracy for both temperature and water vapor, with RMS errors approaching the theoretical expectation for clear sky conditions, while retrievals over a midlatitude land site have poorer performance. The results demonstrate the importance of using specialized “truth” sites for accurate assessment of the advanced sounder performance and motivate the continued refinement of the AIRS science team retrieval algorithm, particularly for retrievals over land.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Validation of the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder temperature and geopotential height measurements
Schwartz, M. J., Lambert, A., Manney, G. L., Read, W. G., Livesey, N. J., Froidevaux, L., Ao, C. O., Bernath, P. F., Boone, C. D., Cofield, R. E., et al. (2008) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2007jd008783 · Cited by 489
Self-citationDivakarla, M. G., Barnet, C. D., Goldberg, M. D., McMillin, L. M., Maddy, E., Wolf, W., Zhou, L., & Liu, X. (2006) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jd006116 · Cited by 344
Satellite Discovery of Anomalously Large Methane Point Sources From Oil/Gas Production
Varon, D. J., McKeever, J., Jervis, D., Maasakkers, J. D., Pandey, S., Houweling, S., Aben, I., Scarpelli, T., & Jacob, D. J. (2019) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2019gl083798 · Cited by 331
Miloshevich, L. M., Vömel, H., Whiteman, D. N., Lesht, B. M., Schmidlin, F. J., & Russo, F. (2006) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jd006083 · Cited by 261
Self-citationLamquin, N., Stubenrauch, C. J., Gierens, K., Burkhardt, U., & Smit, H. (2012) · Atmospheric chemistry and physics · doi:10.5194/acp-12-381-2012 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Tobin, D. C., Revercomb, H. E., Knuteson, R. O., Lesht, B. M., Strow, L. L., Hannon, S. E., Feltz, W. F., Moy, L. A., Fetzer, E. J., & Cress, T. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2006-03-16
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- D9
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076291476
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atmospheric Radiation Measurement site atmospheric state best estimates for Atmospheric Infrared Sounder temperature and water vapor retrieval validation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2005jd006103
- The paper
- Tobin, D. C., Revercomb, H. E., Knuteson, R. O., Lesht, B. M., Strow, L. L., Hannon, S. E., Feltz, W. F., Moy, L. A., Fetzer, E. J., & Cress, T. S. (2006). Atmospheric Radiation Measurement site atmospheric state best estimates for Atmospheric Infrared Sounder temperature and water vapor retrieval validation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.