Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation of space‐based constraints on global nitrogen oxide emissions with regional aircraft measurements over and downwind of eastern North America

Open access
Martin, Randall V., Sioris, Christopher E., Chance, Kelly, Ryerson, Thomas B., Bertram, Timothy H., Wooldridge, Paul J., Cohen, Ronald C., Neuman, J. Andy, Swanson, Aaron, Flocke, Frank M.·2006·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

We retrieve tropospheric nitrogen dioxide (NO 2) columns for May 2004 to April 2005 from the SCIAMACHY satellite instrument to derive top‐down emissions of nitrogen oxides (NO x = NO + NO 2) via inverse modeling with a global chemical transport model (GEOS‐Chem). Simulated NO 2 vertical profiles used in the retrieval are evaluated with airborne measurements over and downwind of North America (ICARTT); a northern midlatitude lightning source of 1.6 Tg N yr−1 minimizes bias in the retrieval. Retrieved NO 2 columns are validated (r 2 = 0.60, slope = 0.82) with coincident airborne in situ measurements. The top‐down emissions are combined with a priori information from a bottom‐up emission inventory with error weighting to achieve an improved a posteriori estimate of the global distribution of surface NO x emissions. Our a posteriori NO x emission inventory for land surface NO x emissions (46.1 Tg N yr−1) is 22% larger than the GEIA‐based a priori bottom‐up inventory for 1998, a difference that reflects rising anthropogenic emissions, especially from East Asia. A posteriori NO x emissions for East Asia (9.8 Tg N yr−1) exceed those from other continents. The a posteriori inventory improves the GEOS‐Chem simulation of NO x, peroxyacetylnitrate, and nitric acid with respect to airborne in situ measurements over and downwind of New York City. The a posteriori is 7% larger than the EDGAR 3.2FT2000 global inventory, 3% larger than the NEI99 inventory for the United States, and 68% larger than a regional inventory for 2000 for eastern Asia. SCIAMACHY NO 2 columns over the North Atlantic show a weak plume from lightning NO x.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2005jd006680

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Martin, R. V., Sioris, C. E., Chance, K., Ryerson, T. B., Bertram, T. H., Wooldridge, P. J., Cohen, R. C., Neuman, J. A., Swanson, A., & Flocke, F. M.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2006-08-11
Volume
111
Issue
D15
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067853903
Cited by
175
References
0
FWCI
13.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of space‐based constraints on global nitrogen oxide emissions with regional aircraft measurements over and downwind of eastern North America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2005jd006680
The paper
Martin, R. V., Sioris, C. E., Chance, K., Ryerson, T. B., Bertram, T. H., Wooldridge, P. J., Cohen, R. C., Neuman, J. A., Swanson, A., & Flocke, F. M. (2006). Evaluation of space‐based constraints on global nitrogen oxide emissions with regional aircraft measurements over and downwind of eastern North America. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006680

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.