The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heterogeneous nucleation of ice on surrogates of mineral dust
Open accessAbstract
Field studies have shown that mineral dust particles can act as ice nuclei in cirrus clouds. Here, we present a laboratory investigation of heterogeneous ice nucleation on surrogates of mineral dust particles, in particular pure Arizona test dust (ATD) particles, and ATD particles coated with sulfuric acid. The experiments have been performed using a new apparatus in which ice formation on the particles is determined by optical microscopy at temperatures between 197 and 260 K and relative humidities up to water saturation. The experiments reveal that pure and sulfuric acid coated ATD particles nucleate ice at considerably lower relative humidities than required for homogeneous ice nucleation in liquid aerosols. Nucleation occurred over a broad relative humidity range indicating that the different minerals contained in ATD have different ice nucleation thresholds. No significant difference in the ice nucleation ability of pure and H 2 SO 4 coated ATD particles was observed. Below 240 K, ice nucleated on ATD particles apparently by deposition nucleation. Preactivation of ATD particles, that is, a reduction in supersaturation, required for heterogeneous ice nucleation after a previous ice nucleation event on the same particle, has been observed for temperatures as low as 200 K. Differences of 10–30% in the onset RH ice values were obtained for particles with or without preactivation. The results indicate that pure and sulfuric acid coated mineral dust particles may act as efficient ice nuclei in the atmosphere. Preactivation of the particles should be considered when modeling long‐range transport of mineral dust particles and their impact on cloud formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness
Albrecht, B. A. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.245.4923.1227 · Cited by 4,422
Aerosols, Climate, and the Hydrological Cycle
Ramanathan, V., Crutzen, P. J., Kiehl, J. T., & Rosenfeld, D. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1064034 · Cited by 3,831
Cited by
Hoose, C., & Möhler, O. (2012) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012 · Cited by 1,227
Pöschl, U., & Shiraiwa, M. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500487s · Cited by 657
A Particle-Surface-Area-Based Parameterization of Immersion Freezing on Desert Dust Particles
Niemand, M., Möhler, O., Vogel, B., Vogel, H., Hoose, C., Connolly, P., Klein, H., Bingemer, H., DeMott, P., Skrotzki, J., et al. (2012) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/jas-d-11-0249.1 · Cited by 451
Hoose, C., Kristjánsson, J. E., Chen, J.-P., & Hazra, A. (2010) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/2010jas3425.1 · Cited by 432
Deposition nucleation viewed as homogeneous or immersion freezing in pores and cavities
Marcolli, C. (2014) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-14-2071-2014 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Knopf, D. A., & Koop, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2006-06-17
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- D12
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005056392
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heterogeneous nucleation of ice on surrogates of mineral dust. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2005jd006894
- The paper
- Knopf, D. A., & Koop, T. (2006). Heterogeneous nucleation of ice on surrogates of mineral dust. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006894
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.