The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling non‐Fickian transport in geological formations as a continuous time random walk
Abstract
Non‐Fickian (or anomalous) transport of contaminants has been observed at field and laboratory scales in a wide variety of porous and fractured geological formations. Over many years a basic challenge to the hydrology community has been to develop a theoretical framework that quantitatively accounts for this widespread phenomenon. Recently, continuous time random walk (CTRW) formulations have been demonstrated to provide general and effective means to quantify non‐Fickian transport. We introduce and develop the CTRW framework from its conceptual picture of transport through its mathematical development to applications relevant to laboratory‐ and field‐scale systems. The CTRW approach contrasts with ones used extensively on the basis of the advection‐dispersion equation and use of upscaling, volume averaging, and homogenization. We examine the underlying assumptions, scope, and differences of these approaches, as well as stochastic formulations, relative to CTRW. We argue why these methods have not been successful in fitting actual measurements. The CTRW has now been developed within the framework of partial differential equations and has been generalized to apply to nonstationary domains and interactions with immobile states (matrix effects). We survey models based on multirate mass transfer (mobile‐immobile) and fractional derivatives and show their connection as subsets within the CTRW framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Mathematical Functions
McQuarrie, D. A. (1966) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1972842 · Cited by 40,433
Anomalous diffusion in disordered media: Statistical mechanisms, models and physical applications
Bouchaud, J.-P., & Georges, A. (1990) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(90)90099-n · Cited by 4,162
Glueckauf, E. (1955) · Trans. Faraday Soc. · doi:10.1039/tf9555101540 · Cited by 967
Cited by
Metzler, R., Jeon, J.-H., Cherstvy, A. G., & Barkai, E. (2014) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c4cp03465a · Cited by 1,765
Metadata
- Authors
- Berkowitz, B., Cortis, A., Dentz, M., & Scher, H.
- Venue
- Reviews of Geophysics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-1209
- 1944-9208
- OpenAlex
- W2043922553
- Cited by
- 1,168
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 43.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling non‐Fickian transport in geological formations as a continuous time random walk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2005rg000178
- The paper
- Berkowitz, B., Cortis, A., Dentz, M., & Scher, H. (2006). Modeling non‐Fickian transport in geological formations as a continuous time random walk. Reviews of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005rg000178
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.