Cited by 535Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology

A global inventory of the soil CH4 sink

Open access
Dutaur, Laure, Verchot, Louis V.·2007·Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Abstract

Methane uptake by soils is a small but important flux in the global budget of atmospheric methane, and could be susceptible to changes in land use and climate. Estimates of this sink vary between 20 and 45 Tg yr−1. We propose to develop a better constrained estimate using a mechanistic understanding of the biogeochemical controls of soil CH 4 uptake. We reviewed over 120 published papers reporting field measurements of CH 4 uptake and made over 318 annual estimates of CH 4 uptake for various types of ecosystems. We collected data from these papers for a number of parameters that are known to influence the magnitude of the sink including climatic zone, ecosystem, latitude, annual mean rainfall, annual mean temperature, and the soil texture. Regression analyses with the continuous variables (latitude, rainfall, and temperature) yielded results with poor predictive ability and no significant relationship. Stratification by class variables such as climatic zone, ecosystem type and soil texture provided better predictive ability (R 2 = 0.29, P < 0.0001). The mean largest uptake rates were observed in temperate forests with coarse soil texture, but the variance within this stratum was also large. Without any stratification, we estimate that the global soil CH 4 sink is 36 ± 23 Tg yr−1. With stratification, the best current estimate of the global soil uptake of CH 4 is 22 ± 12 Tg yr−1. The ecosystem type accounted for the largest part of the variation in the global data set. This inventory showed that ecosystem type, geographic zone, and soil texture strongly control CH 4 uptake. Inventory methods that take into account underlying factors that control the process provide better estimates of sink strength.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2006gb002734

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dutaur, L., & Verchot, L. V.
Affiliations
World Agroforestry Centre (KE)
Venue
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
2007-11-15
Volume
21
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9224
OpenAlex
W2111989634
Cited by
535
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
FWCI
15.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Global Biogeochemical Cycles (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Keywords
soil methane uptake, methane sinks, global methane budget, soil methane flux, ecosystem types, soil texture, climate zones, temperate forests, biogeochemical controls, temperature and precipitation effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review