A global inventory of the soil CH4 sink
Open accessAbstract
Methane uptake by soils is a small but important flux in the global budget of atmospheric methane, and could be susceptible to changes in land use and climate. Estimates of this sink vary between 20 and 45 Tg yr−1. We propose to develop a better constrained estimate using a mechanistic understanding of the biogeochemical controls of soil CH 4 uptake. We reviewed over 120 published papers reporting field measurements of CH 4 uptake and made over 318 annual estimates of CH 4 uptake for various types of ecosystems. We collected data from these papers for a number of parameters that are known to influence the magnitude of the sink including climatic zone, ecosystem, latitude, annual mean rainfall, annual mean temperature, and the soil texture. Regression analyses with the continuous variables (latitude, rainfall, and temperature) yielded results with poor predictive ability and no significant relationship. Stratification by class variables such as climatic zone, ecosystem type and soil texture provided better predictive ability (R 2 = 0.29, P < 0.0001). The mean largest uptake rates were observed in temperate forests with coarse soil texture, but the variance within this stratum was also large. Without any stratification, we estimate that the global soil CH 4 sink is 36 ± 23 Tg yr−1. With stratification, the best current estimate of the global soil uptake of CH 4 is 22 ± 12 Tg yr−1. The ecosystem type accounted for the largest part of the variation in the global data set. This inventory showed that ecosystem type, geographic zone, and soil texture strongly control CH 4 uptake. Inventory methods that take into account underlying factors that control the process provide better estimates of sink strength.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Forest and grassland soils are primary consumers of CH4 due to methane oxidation bacteria in soils.
“Some studies [38,39] have shown that forest and grassland soils are the primary consumers of CH4 thanks to methane oxidation bacteria in soils.”
From Effects of Biofuel Crop Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) Cultivation on Soil Carbon Sequestration and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Review (2022) · cites this paper as [39]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bai, J., Luo, L., Li, A., Lai, X., Zhang, X., Yu, Y., Wang, H., Wu, N., & Zhang, L. (2022) · Life · doi:10.3390/life12122105 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dutaur, L., & Verchot, L. V.
- Affiliations
- World Agroforestry Centre (KE)
- ORCID
- Verchot, Louis V.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2007-11-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W2111989634
- Cited by
- 535
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 15.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
- Keywords
- soil methane uptake, methane sinks, global methane budget, soil methane flux, ecosystem types, soil texture, climate zones, temperate forests, biogeochemical controls, temperature and precipitation effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review