Cited by 172High-pressure geophysics and materialsGeological and Geophysical Studiesearthquake and tectonic studies

Thermal cracking and the deep hydration of oceanic lithosphere: A key to the generation of plate tectonics?

Korenaga, Jun·2007·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

The development of transient thermal stress in suboceanic mantle is investigated on the basis of two‐dimensional thermoviscoelastic models incorporating composite rheology appropriate for dry oceanic lithosphere. Thermal stress is shown to be sufficiently high to deeply fracture the coldest part of lithosphere, e.g., to the depth of at least ∼30 km (and possibly down to ∼50 km) in 100‐Ma‐old lithosphere. The release of thermal stress by tension cracking is limited to the vicinity of cracks, and the cascade crack system is suggested to be required given the finite fracture strength of mantle materials. Possible physical and chemical consequences of deep thermal cracking are also discussed. The rheological evolution of oceanic lithosphere is likely to be affected by thermal cracking and subsequent serpentinization, which introduces the localized zones of weakness in the otherwise stiffest part of lithosphere. This localized weakening may help to explain why plate tectonic convection, not stagnant lid convection, operates in Earth's mantle.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2006jb004502

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With the thermal cracking hypothesis, the stiffest part of oceanic lithosphere is continually damaged as it ages, so preexisting weakness is globally distributed.

    “With the thermal cracking hypothesis, the stiffest47 part of oceanic lithosphere is continually damaged as it ages, so preexisting weakness is48 globally distributed.”

    From Scaling of plate-tectonic convection with pseudoplastic rheology (2010) · cites this paper as Korenaga, 2007

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 88 · Cited by 172

Authors
Korenaga, J.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Korenaga, Jun
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
2007-05
Volume
112
Issue
B5
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046984304
Cited by
172
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › earthquake and tectonic studies
Keywords
thermal cracking, oceanic lithosphere, thermal stress, composite rheology, tension cracking, serpentinization, plate tectonics, stagnant lid convection, mantle convection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review