Cited by 56Geophysics and Gravity Measurementsearthquake and tectonic studiesGeological and Tectonic Studies in Latin America

Models of active glacial isostasy roofing warm subduction: Case of the South Patagonian Ice Field

Open access
Klemann, Volker, Ivins, Erik R., Martinec, Zdeněk, Wolf, Detlef·2007·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

Modern geodetic techniques such as precise Global Positioning System (GPS) and high‐resolution space gravity mapping (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment, GRACE) make it possible to measure the present‐day rate of viscoelastic gravitational Earth response to present and past glacier mass changes. The Andes of Patagonia contain glacial environments of dramatic mass change. These mass load changes occur near a tectonically active boundary between the Antarctic and South American plates. The mechanical strength of the continental side of this boundary is influenced by Neogene ridge subduction and by the subduction of a youthful oceanic slab. A ridge of young volcanos parallels the Pacific coastline. Release of volatiles (such as water) at depth along this ridge creates a unique rheological environment. To assess the influence of this rheological ridge structure on the observational land uplift rate, we apply a two‐dimensional viscoelastic Earth model. A numerical study is presented which examines the sensitivity of the glacial loading‐unloading response to the complex structure at depth related to the subducting slab, the viscous wedge between slab and continental lithosphere, and the increase of elastic thickness from oceanic to continental lithosphere. A key feature revealed by our numerical experiments is a continuum flow wherein the slab subdues the material transport toward oceanic mantle and crust. The restricted flow is sensitive to the details of slab mechanical stre…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2006jb004818

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 25 · Cited by 56

Authors
Klemann, V., Ivins, E. R., Martinec, Z., & Wolf, D.
Affiliations
  • GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE)
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
2007-09
Volume
112
Issue
B9
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085055933
Cited by
56
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
  • Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Tectonic Studies in Latin America
Keywords
glacial isostasy, viscoelastic Earth model, subduction, mantle wedge, effective elastic thickness, land uplift, glacier mass change, ridge subduction, asthenospheric flow, mantle viscosity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review