Cited by 176Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsCryospheric studies and observationsOcean Waves and Remote Sensing

Intercomparison of passive microwave sea ice concentration retrievals over the high‐concentration Arctic sea ice

Andersen, Søren, Tonboe, Rasmus, Kaleschke, Lars, Heygster, Georg, Pedersen, Leif Toudal·2007·Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Abstract

Measurements of sea ice concentration from the Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) using seven different algorithms are compared to ship observations, sea ice divergence estimates from the Radarsat Geophysical Processor System, and ice and water surface type classification of 59 wide‐swath synthetic aperture radar (SAR) scenes. The analysis is confined to the high‐concentration Arctic sea ice, where the ice cover is near 100%. During winter the results indicate that the variability of the SSM/I concentration estimates is larger than the true variability of ice concentration. Results from a trusted subset of the SAR scenes across the central Arctic allow the separation of the ice concentration uncertainty due to emissivity variations and sensor noise from other error sources during the winter of 2003–2004. Depending on the algorithm, error standard deviations from 2.5 to 5.0% are found with sensor noise between 1.3 and 1.8%. This is in accord with variability estimated from analysis of SSM/I time series. Algorithms, which primarily use 85 GHz information, consistently give the best agreement with both SAR ice concentrations and ship observations. Although the 85 GHz information is more sensitive to atmospheric influences, it was found that the atmospheric contribution is secondary to the influence of the surface emissivity variability. Analysis of the entire SSM/I time series shows that there are significant differences in trend between sea ice extent and area, using diffe…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2006jc003543

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The weather filters of Cavalieri et al. (1992) have been used in basically all available SIC CDRs except the earlier EUMETSAT OSI SAF data sets.

    “The weather filters (WFs) of Cavalieri et al. (1992) have been used in basically all available SIC CDRs except the earlier EUMETSAT OSI SAF data sets (Andersen et al., 2007;Ton-boe et al., 2016).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andersen, S., Tonboe, R., Kaleschke, L., Heygster, G., & Pedersen, L. T.
Affiliations
  • Danish Meteorological Institute (DK)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • University of Bremen (DE)
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Published
2007-08
Volume
112
Issue
C8
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024398121
Cited by
176
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
Keywords
sea ice concentration, SSM/I, Arctic sea ice, sensor noise, ship-based observations, RADARSAT

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review