The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Source characterization of biomass burning particles: The combustion of selected European conifers, African hardwood, savanna grass, and German and Indonesian peat
Abstract
We carried out a detailed size‐resolved chemical characterization of particle emissions from the combustion of European conifer species, savanna grass, African hardwood, and German and Indonesian peat. Combustion particles were sampled using two sets of five‐stage Berner‐type cascade impactors after a buffer volume and a dilution tunnel. We determined the emission factors of water‐soluble organic carbon (WSOC, 46–6700 mg kg−1, sum of five stages), water‐insoluble organic carbon (WISOC, 1300–6100 mg kg−1), (apparent) elemental carbon (ECa, 490–1800 mg kg−1), inorganic ions (68–400 mg kg−1), n‐alkanes (0.38–910 mg kg−1), n‐alkenes (0.45–180 mg kg−1), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (1.4–28 mg kg−1), oxy‐PAHs (0.08‐1.0 mg kg−1), lignin decomposition products (59–620 mg kg−1), nitrophenols (1.4–31 mg kg−1), resin acids (0–110 mg kg−1), and cellulose and hemicellulose decomposition products (540–5900 mg kg−1). The combustion and particle emission characteristics of both of peat were significantly different from those of the other biofuels. Peat burning yielded significantly higher emission factors of total fine particles in comparison to the other biofuels. Very high emission factors of n‐alkanes and n‐alkenes were observed from peat combustion, which may be connected to the concurrently observed “missing” CCN in peat smoke. A high level of monosaccharide anhydrides, especially levoglucosan, was detected from all types of biofuel combustion. The fractions of monosaccharide anhydrides in the emitted total carbon were higher in smaller particles (aerodynamic diameter, Dpa < 0.42 μ m).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols
Andreae, M. O., & Gelencsér, A. (2006) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006 · Cited by 2,006
Self-citation
Cited by
Lamarque, J.-F., Bond, T. C., Eyring, V., Granier, C., Heil, A., Klimont, Z., Lee, D., Liousse, C., Mieville, A., Owen, B., et al. (2010) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010 · Cited by 2,105
Keyte, I. J., Harrison, R. M., & Lammel, G. (2013) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c3cs60147a · Cited by 758
The Molecular Identification of Organic Compounds in the Atmosphere: State of the Art and Challenges
Nozière, B., Kalberer, M., Claeys, M., Allan, J., D’Anna, B., Decesari, S., Finessi, E., Glasius, M., Grgić, I., Hamilton, J. F., et al. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5003485 · Cited by 656
Self-citationPhotochemical processing of aqueous atmospheric brown carbon
Zhao, R., Lee, A. K. Y., Huang, L., Li, X., Yang, F., & Abbatt, J. P. D. (2015) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-15-6087-2015 · Cited by 373
Walgraeve, C., Demeestere, K., Dewulf, J., Zimmermann, R., & Van Langenhove, H. (2010) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.004 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Iinuma, Y., Brüggemann, E., Gnauk, T., Müller, K., Andreae, M. O., Helas, G., Parmar, R., & Herrmann, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2007-04-25
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- D8
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1963674693
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Source characterization of biomass burning particles: The combustion of selected European conifers, African hardwood, savanna grass, and German and Indonesian peat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2006jd007120
- The paper
- Iinuma, Y., Brüggemann, E., Gnauk, T., Müller, K., Andreae, M. O., Helas, G., Parmar, R., & Herrmann, H. (2007). Source characterization of biomass burning particles: The combustion of selected European conifers, African hardwood, savanna grass, and German and Indonesian peat. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.