The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of mixing on evolution of hydrocarbon ratios in the troposphere
Open accessAbstract
Nonmethane hydrocarbon (NMHC) concentration ratios provide useful indicators of tropospheric oxidation and transport processes. However, the influences of both photochemical and mixing processes are inextricably linked in the evolution of these ratios. We present a model for investigating these influences by combining the transport treatment of the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART with an ultrasimple (i.e., constant OH concentration) chemical treatment. Required model input includes NMHC emission ratios, but not ad hoc assumed background NMHC concentrations. The model results give NMHC relationships that can be directly compared, in a statistical manner, with measurements. The measured concentration ratios of the longest‐lived alkanes show strong deviations from purely kinetic behavior, which the model nicely reproduces. In contrast, some measured aromatic ratio relationships show even stronger deviations that are not well reproduced by the model for reasons that are not understood. The model‐measurement comparisons indicate that the interaction of mixing and photochemical processing prevent a simple interpretation of “photochemical age,” but that the average age of any particular NMHC can be well defined and can be approximated by a properly chosen and interpreted NMHC ratio. In summary, the relationships of NMHC concentration ratios not only yield useful measures of photochemical processing in the troposphere, but also provide useful test of the treatment of mixing and chemical processing in chemical transport models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Atmospheric composition change – global and regional air quality
Monks, P. S., Granier, C., Fuzzi, S., Stohl, A., Williams, M. L., Akimoto, H., Amann, M., Baklanov, A., Baltensperger, U., Bey, I., et al. (2009) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.021 · Cited by 872
Self-citationGilman, J. B., Lerner, B. M., Kuster, W. C., & de Gouw, J. A. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es304119a · Cited by 375
Self-citationYokelson, R. J., Andreae, M. O., & Akagi, S. K. (2013) · Atmospheric Measurement Techniques · doi:10.5194/amt-6-2155-2013 · Cited by 93
Non-methane hydrocarbon (C 2 –C 8 ) sources and sinks around the Arabian Peninsula
Bourtsoukidis, E., Ernle, L., Crowley, J. N., Lelieveld, J., Paris, J.-D., Pozzer, A., Walter, D., & Williams, J. (2019) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-19-7209-2019 · Cited by 85
Aged Boreal Biomass-Burning Aerosol Size Distributions from Bortas 2011
Sakamoto, K. M., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Taylor, J. W., Duck, T. J., & Pierce, J. R. (2015) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-15-1633-2015 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Parrish, D. D., Stohl, A., Forster, C., Atlas, E. L., Blake, D. R., Goldan, P. D., Kuster, W. C., & de Gouw, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2007-03-21
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- D10
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165346667
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of mixing on evolution of hydrocarbon ratios in the troposphere. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2006jd007583
- The paper
- Parrish, D. D., Stohl, A., Forster, C., Atlas, E. L., Blake, D. R., Goldan, P. D., Kuster, W. C., & de Gouw, J. A. (2007). Effects of mixing on evolution of hydrocarbon ratios in the troposphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007583
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.