Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 245

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of the global distribution of water isotopes using the NCAR atmospheric general circulation model

Open access
Lee, Jung‐Eun, Fung, Inez, DePaolo, Donald J., Henning, Cara C.·2007·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

We have incorporated the cycling of water isotopes into the NCAR atmospheric general circulation model, CAM2. Isotope dynamics mostly follow those of previous isotope GCMs, with fractionation being produced by evaporation at the surface and by cloud processes. A new feature that we have added is the direct estimation of the degree of isotopic equilibration between vapor and raindrops as a function of temperature and rain rate. The model yields a reasonable global pattern of water isotopes in precipitation, but detailed comparison with observations is limited by known inaccuracies in precipitation and temperatures yielded by CAM2. We use the results to evaluate the fundamental controls on water isotopic composition in precipitation. We emphasize that, over much of the surface of the Earth, the concept of Rayleigh distillation is inadequate to understand the large‐scale geographic distribution of water isotopes in precipitation, because the effects of surface fluxes are more important than those of distillation, in particular at low and midlatitudes and over the oceans. In oceanic regions the balance between precipitation and evaporation (P − E), which reflects the large‐scale atmospheric circulation, is the primary determinant of the isotopic composition of precipitation and vapor. Variations of P − E at low latitudes over the oceans produce about 7‰ variation of precipitation δ18 O that is independent of temperature variation. Where P > E, the convergence of atmospheric vapor derived from various sources leads to low values and a particularly wide range in δppt. In the tropical and subtropical troposphere the vertical decrease of δ18 O in vapor is different from the values expected from Rayleigh distillation because of entrainment, convective mixing, detrainment, evaporation of detrained water, and subsidence of low‐δ18 O high‐altitude air. The low δ18 O of atmospheric vapor over the oceans at high (ca. 55°) latitudes produces, as a result of kinetic effects associated with evaporation, a zone of heavy (high‐δ18 O) evaporation from the oceans. This effect may account for the low δ18 O of some high‐latitude ocean surface waters and also helps attenuate the effects of global temperature changes on the isotopic composition of polar precipitation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2006jd007657

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 245

Metadata

Authors
Lee, J., Fung, I., DePaolo, D. J., & Henning, C. C.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2007-08-25
Volume
112
Issue
D16
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034757360
Cited by
245
References
1
FWCI
15.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of the global distribution of water isotopes using the NCAR atmospheric general circulation model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2006jd007657
The paper
Lee, J., Fung, I., DePaolo, D. J., & Henning, C. C. (2007). Analysis of the global distribution of water isotopes using the NCAR atmospheric general circulation model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007657

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.