Cited by 489Atmospheric Ozone and ClimateAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Sensitivity of chemical tracers to meteorological parameters in the MOZART‐3 chemical transport model

Open access
Kinnison, D. E., Brasseur, G. P., Walters, S., Garcia, R. R., Marsh, D. R., Sassi, F., Harvey, V. L., Randall, C. E. +12 more·2007·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

The Model for Ozone and Related Chemical Tracers, version 3 (MOZART‐3), which represents the chemical and physical processes from the troposphere through the lower mesosphere, was used to evaluate the representation of long‐lived tracers and ozone using three different meteorological fields. The meteorological fields are based on (1) the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model, version 1b (WACCM1b), (2) the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) operational analysis, and (3) a new reanalysis for year 2000 from ECMWF called EXP471. Model‐derived tracers (methane, water vapor, and total inorganic nitrogen) and ozone are compared to data climatologies from satellites. Model mean age of air was also derived and compared to in situ CO 2 and SF 6 data. A detailed analysis of the chemical fields simulated by MOZART‐3 shows that even though the general features characterizing the three dynamical sets are rather similar, slight differences in winds and temperature can produce substantial differences in the calculated distributions of chemical tracers. The MOZART‐3 simulations that use meteorological fields from WACCM1b and ECMWF EXP471 represented best the distribution of long‐lived tracers and mean age of air in the stratosphere. There was a significant improvement using the ECMWF EXP471 reanalysis data product over the ECMWF operational data product. The effect of the quasi‐biennial oscillation circulation on long‐lived tracers and ozone is examined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2006jd007879

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In CESM2(WACCM6), photolysis rates are calculated using lookup tables that account for the overhead ozone column and clouds but exclude the effects of aerosols, thereby reducing the effect SAI aerosols could have on tropospheric photochemistry and ozone.

    “in CESM2(WACCM6) photolysis rates are calculated using lookup tables, taking into account the overhead ozone column and clouds but excluding the effects of aerosols, thereby reducing the effect SAI aerosols could have on tropospheric photochemistry and ozone.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 489

Authors
Kinnison, D. E., Brasseur, G. P., Walters, S., Garcia, R. R., Marsh, D. R., Sassi, F., Harvey, V. L., Randall, C. E., Emmons, L., Lamarque, J. F., Hess, P., Orlando, J. J., Tie, X. X., Randel, W., Pan, L. L., Gettelman, A., Granier, C., Diehl, T., Niemeier, U., & Simmons, A. J.
Affiliations
  • NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder Colorado USA
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (DE)
  • European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (GB)
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2007-10-17
Volume
112
Issue
D20
Pages
D20302
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090718018
Cited by
489
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 27
FWCI
12.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
meteorological forcing, ozone, methane, water vapor, inorganic nitrogen, age of air, stratosphere, ECMWF reanalysis, quasi-biennial oscillation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review