The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Seasonal trends and possible sources of brown carbon based on 2‐year aerosol measurements at six sites in Europe
Abstract
Brown carbon is a ubiquitous and unidentified component of organic aerosol which has recently come into the forefront of atmospheric research. This component is strongly linked to the class of humic‐like substances (HULIS) in aerosol whose ultimate origin is still being debated. Using a simplified spectroscopic method the concentrations of brown carbon have been determined in aqueous extracts of fine aerosol collected during the CARBOSOL project. On the basis of the results of 2‐year measurements of several aerosol constituents at six European sites, possible sources of brown carbon are inferred. Biomass burning (possibly domestic wood burning) is shown to be a major source of brown carbon in winter. At elevated sites in spring, smoke from agricultural fires may be an additional source. Direct comparison of measured brown carbon concentrations with HULIS determined by an independent method reveals that the two quantities correlate well at low‐elevation sites throughout the year. At high‐elevation sites the correlation is still high for winter but becomes markedly lower in summer, implying different sources and/or atmospheric sinks of brown carbon and HULIS. The results shed some light on the relationships between atmospheric brown carbon and HULIS, two ill‐defined and overlapping components of organic aerosol.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols
Andreae, M. O., & Gelencsér, A. (2006) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006 · Cited by 2,006
Self-citationPuxbaum, H., Caseiro, A., Sánchez‐Ochoa, A., Kasper‐Giebl, A., Claeys, M., Gelencsér, A., Legrand, M., Preunkert, S., & Pio, C. (2007) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2006jd008114 · Cited by 480
Self-citation
Cited by
Molecular Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown Carbon Inferred from a Nationwide Biomass Burning Event
Lin, P., Bluvshtein, N., Rudich, Y., Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., & Laskin, A. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b02276 · Cited by 382
Bones, D. L., Henricksen, D. K., Mang, S. A., Gonsior, M., Bateman, A. P., Nguyen, T. B., Cooper, W. J., & Nizkorodov, S. A. (2010) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2009jd012864 · Cited by 299
Analyzing and reducing the risks of inadvertent nuclear war between the United States and Russia
Barrett, A. M., Baum, S. D., & Hostetler, K. (2013) · Science & Global Security · doi:10.1080/08929882.2013.798984 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Lukács, H., Gelencsér, A., Hammer, S., Puxbaum, H., Pio, C., Legrand, M., Kasper‐Giebl, A., Handler, M., Limbeck, A., Simpson, D., & Preunkert, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- D23
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142888396
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seasonal trends and possible sources of brown carbon based on 2‐year aerosol measurements at six sites in Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2006jd008151
- The paper
- Lukács, H., Gelencsér, A., Hammer, S., Puxbaum, H., Pio, C., Legrand, M., Kasper‐Giebl, A., Handler, M., Limbeck, A., Simpson, D., & Preunkert, S. (2007). Seasonal trends and possible sources of brown carbon based on 2‐year aerosol measurements at six sites in Europe. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008151
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.