The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interplay of sediment supply, river incision, and channel morphology revealed by the transient evolution of an experimental bedrock channel
Abstract
In transient landscapes, adjustments in river channel width, roughness, and alluvial cover, in addition to slope, provide potentially important but poorly understood mechanisms by which bedrock channels accommodate changes in external forcing. We used a laboratory flume to investigate experimentally how bedrock channel slope, width, roughness, alluvial cover, and incision rate collectively adjusted during the transient incision of an initially smooth channel with a varying bed load supply rate. When the channel was free of alluvial cover, incision was focused over a fraction of the bed width that varied strongly with both bed load supply and bed load transport capacity. Nondimensionalization yields a relationship for the width of active incision that explicitly incorporates bed load supply rate, sediment grain size, and bed shear stress, which suggests that in natural channels, width may respond dynamically to accommodate changes in bed load sediment supply. Because increases in sediment supply widened the band of active bed load sediment transport and thus the width over which incision took place, mass removal from the bed scaled with sediment supply when the bed was free of cover, consistent with incision being limited by the availability of erosive tools. However, bed roughness growth due to the spatial variation of incision during the experiment eventually inhibited bed load transport efficiency. This, in turn, led to deposition of alluvial cover and the suppression of incision on the bed at high sediment supply rates, consistent with incision being limited by the extent of alluvial cover deposited on the bed. The dynamics of roughness creation and alluvial cover deposition can therefore drive both negative and positive feedbacks on incision rate change following sediment supply perturbations. These experimental results offer several potentially field‐testable hypotheses that together may help explain variability in the width, slope, and bed roughness of bedrock river channels in transient landscapes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The stream power river incision model: evidence, theory and beyond
Lague, D. (2014) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3462 · Cited by 542
DiBiase, R. A., & Whipple, K. X. (2011) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/2011jf002095 · Cited by 333
Whipple, K. X., DiBiase, R. A., & Crosby, B. T. (2013) · Treatise on Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374739-6.00254-2 · Cited by 190
Barnhart, C. J., Howard, A. D., & Moore, J. M. (2009) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/2008je003122 · Cited by 139
Characterization of slow slip rate faults in humid areas: Cimandiri fault zone, Indonesia
Marliyani, G. I., Arrowsmith, J. R., & Whipple, K. X. (2016) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface · doi:10.1002/2016jf003846 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Finnegan, N. J., Sklar, L. S., & Fuller, T. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2007-06-28
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- F3
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007137349
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interplay of sediment supply, river incision, and channel morphology revealed by the transient evolution of an experimental bedrock channel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2006jf000569
- The paper
- Finnegan, N. J., Sklar, L. S., & Fuller, T. K. (2007). Interplay of sediment supply, river incision, and channel morphology revealed by the transient evolution of an experimental bedrock channel. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jf000569
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.