The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A global analysis of temporal and spatial variations in continental water storage
Open accessAbstract
While continental water storage plays a key role in the Earth's water, energy, and biogeochemical cycles, its temporal and spatial variations are poorly known, in particular, for large areas. This study analyzes water storage simulated with the Watergap Global Hydrology Model. The model represents four major storage compartments: surface water, snow, soil, and groundwater. Water storage variations are analyzed for the period 1961–1995 with 0.5° resolution, for the major global climate zones, and for the 30 largest river basins worldwide. Seasonal variations are the dominant storage change signal with maximum values in the marginal tropics and in snow‐dominated high‐latitude areas. Interannual variations are associated with large‐scale oscillations such as El Niño Southern Oscillation. The contribution of individual water storage compartments to total storage change varies with the climate region and the timescale under consideration. In most regions, a prominent role of storage variations in surface water bodies is found. Surface water reduces markedly the spatial correlation lengths of water storage fields. The simulation results are evaluated against storage variations of combined atmospheric‐terrestrial water balance studies and other global models. This study contributes to an improved understanding of continental water storage for which the consistent integration of model results and new observations such as from time‐variable gravity data of the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission is required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bookhagen, B., & Burbank, D. W. (2010) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface · doi:10.1029/2009jf001426 · Cited by 1,374
Müller Schmied, H., Eisner, S., Franz, D., Wattenbach, M., Portmann, F. T., Flörke, M., & Döll, P. (2014) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-18-3511-2014 · Cited by 415
Self-citationTowards hybrid modeling of the global hydrological cycle
Kraft, B., Jung, M., Körner, M., Koirala, S., & Reichstein, M. (2022) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-26-1579-2022 · Cited by 173
Metadata
- Authors
- Güntner, A., Stuck, J., Werth, S., Döll, P., Verzano, K., & Merz, B.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1933126569
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A global analysis of temporal and spatial variations in continental water storage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2006wr005247
- The paper
- Güntner, A., Stuck, J., Werth, S., Döll, P., Verzano, K., & Merz, B. (2007). A global analysis of temporal and spatial variations in continental water storage. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006wr005247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.