Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000
Abstract
Croplands cover ∼15 million km 2 of the planet and provide the bulk of the food and fiber essential to human well‐being. Most global land cover data sets from satellites group croplands into just a few categories, thereby excluding information that is critical for answering key questions ranging from biodiversity conservation to food security to biogeochemical cycling. Information about agricultural land use practices like crop selection, yield, and fertilizer use is even more limited. Here we present land use data sets created by combining national, state, and county level census statistics with a recently updated global data set of croplands on a 5 min by 5 min (∼10 km by 10 km) latitude‐longitude grid. The resulting land use data sets depict circa the year 2000 the area (harvested) and yield of 175 distinct crops of the world. We aggregate these individual crop maps to produce novel maps of 11 major crop groups, crop net primary production, and four physiologically based crop types: annuals/perennials, herbaceous/shrubs/trees, C 3 /C 4 , and leguminous/nonleguminous.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Crop yields across much of the tropics are roughly half the yields achieved under more intensive management practices for many crops.
“However, crop yields across much of the tropics are roughly half the yields achieved under more intensive management practices for many crops”
From Carbon payback times for crop-based biofuel expansion in the tropics: the effects of changing yield and technology (2008) · cites this paper as Monfreda et al 2008
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 54 · Cited by 1,895
- Authors
- Monfreda, C., Ramankutty, N., & Foley, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- McGill University (CA)
- ORCID
- Ramankutty, Navin
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W1885078460
- Cited by
- 1,895
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 73 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 135 · 2023: 134 · 2022: 155 · 2021: 174 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 116 · 2018: 116 · 2017: 99 · 2016: 126 · 2015: 98 · 2014: 106 · 2013: 99 · 2012: 85
- FWCI
- 40.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Keywords
- cropland mapping, crop acreage, crop yield, Fabaceae, agricultural land use, food security, biogeochemical cycles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review