Cited by 166Geophysics and Gravity MeasurementsCryospheric studies and observationsGeology and Paleoclimatology Research

Patagonia Icefield melting observed by Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE)

Chen, J. L., Wilson, C. R., Tapley, B. D., Blankenship, D. D., Ivins, E. R.·2007·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

Using recently released reprocessed gravity solutions from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), we estimate the ice loss rate for the Patagonia Icefield (PIF) of South America, for the period April 2002 through December 2006. After postglacial rebound and hydrological effects are corrected, the estimated rate is −27.9 ± 11 km 3 /year, equivalent to an average loss of ∼−1.6 m/year ice thickness change if evenly distributed over the entire PIF area. The estimated contribution to global sea level rise is 0.078 ± 0.031 mm/year. This is an independent confirmation of relatively large melting rate estimates from earlier studies employing topographic and cartographic data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2007gl031871

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent mass balance measurements consistently show an increasing ice loss from ∼15 Gt yr−1 between ∼1940-2000 to ∼25 Gt yr−1 between ∼2000-2012.

    “Recent mass balance measurements in the Patagonian Icefields -e.g. the Shuttle-Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) or Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) -often present discrepancies but consistently show an increasing ice loss from ∼ 15 Gt yr -1 between ∼ 1940-2000 to ∼ 25 Gt yr -1 between ∼ 2000-2012 (Aniya, 1996;Aniya et al., 1997;Rignot et al., 2003;Chen et al., 2007;Ivins et al., 2011”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 24 · Cited by 166

Authors
Chen, J. L., Wilson, C. R., Tapley, B. D., Blankenship, D. D., & Ivins, E. R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Texas Institute for Geophysics (US)
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2007-11
Volume
34
Issue
22
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W1963786820
Cited by
166
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion)
  • Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Keywords
ice mass balance, ice thickness change, sea level rise, ice sheet melting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review