A new analysis of experimental data on olivine rheology
Abstract
We present a new statistical framework to analyze rock deformation data and determine a corresponding flow law and its uncertainty. All experimental uncertainties, including inter‐run bias, are taken into account in the new formalism. Our approach is based on Bayesian statistics and is implemented by a Markov chain Monte Carlo method. We apply this approach to published data on the subsolidus deformation of synthetic olivine aggregates and try to establish experimental constraints on the rheology of Earth's upper mantle. Deformation data are interpreted on the basis of a composite flow law, which includes diffusion and dislocation creep mechanisms under both dry and wet conditions. We show that olivine rheology under wet conditions suffers major uncertainties suggesting the influence of poorly characterized parameters such as water content during deformation. Also, the pressure dependence of creep is still poorly constrained because of the lack of high‐quality data under high pressures. However, our statistical analysis provides a solid framework to obtain a permissible range of flow laws constrained by the existing data, which will help geodynamic modeling with well‐defined statistical bounds.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Activation volumes for mantle rheology are still poorly known even for upper mantle minerals.
“activation volumes for mantle rheology are still poorly known even237 for upper mantle minerals”
From Scaling of plate-tectonic convection with pseudoplastic rheology (2010) · cites this paper as Korenaga and Karato, 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 73 · Cited by 210
- Authors
- Korenaga, J., & Karato, S.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- B2
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080519657
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 12.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › High-pressure geophysics and materials
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › earthquake and tectonic studies
- Keywords
- olivine rheology, flow law, upper mantle, diffusion creep, dislocation creep, moisture content, Bayesian analysis, Markov chain Monte Carlo, uncertainty quantification, geodynamic modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review