Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 447

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NOx emission trends for China, 1995–2004: The view from the ground and the view from space

Zhang, Qiang, Streets, David G., He, Kebin, Wang, Yuxuan, Richter, Andreas, Burrows, John P., Uno, Itsushi, Jang, Carey J., Chen, Dan, Yao, Zhiliang, Lei, Yu·2007·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

A rapid increase of NO 2 columns over China has been observed by satellite instruments in recent years. We present a 10‐a regional trend of NO x emissions in China from 1995 to 2004 using a bottom‐up methodology and compare the emission trends with the NO 2 column trends observed from GOME and SCIAMACHY, the two spaceborne instruments. We use a dynamic methodology to reflect the dramatic change in China's NO x emissions caused by energy growth and technology renewal. We use a scenario analysis approach to identify the possible sources of uncertainties in the current bottom‐up inventory, in comparison with the satellite observation data. Our best estimates for China's NO x emissions are 10.9 Tg in 1995 and 18.6 Tg in 2004, increasing by 70% during the period considered. NO x emissions and satellite‐based NO 2 columns show broad agreement in temporal evolution and spatial distribution. Both the emission inventory data and the satellite observations indicate a continuous and accelerating growth rate between 1996 and 2004 over east central China. However, the growth rate from the emission inventory is lower than that from the satellite observations. From 1996 to 2004, NO x emissions over the region increased by 61% according to the inventory, while a 95% increase in the NO 2 columns measured by satellite was observed during the same period. We found good agreement during summertime but a large discrepancy during wintertime. The consistency between the summertime trends suggests that the bias cannot be due to systematic error of activity data or emission factors. The reasons for the discrepancy cannot yet be fully identified, but possible explanations include an underestimation in seasonal emission variations, variability of meteorology, NO x injection height, and the increasing trend of sulfate aerosols.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2007jd008684

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 447

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Q., Streets, D. G., He, K., Wang, Y., Richter, A., Burrows, J. P., Uno, I., Jang, C. J., Chen, D., Yao, Z., & Lei, Y.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2007-11-27
Volume
112
Issue
D22
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155213720
Cited by
447
References
39
FWCI
14.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NOx emission trends for China, 1995–2004: The view from the ground and the view from space. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2007jd008684
The paper
Zhang, Q., Streets, D. G., He, K., Wang, Y., Richter, A., Burrows, J. P., Uno, I., Jang, C. J., Chen, D., Yao, Z., & Lei, Y. (2007). NOx emission trends for China, 1995–2004: The view from the ground and the view from space. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008684

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.