The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Validation of the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument total column ozone product
Open accessAbstract
This paper is an overview of the validation of the total column ozone data products from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on board the NASA EOS‐Aura satellite. OMI is an imaging UV/visible spectrometer that maps global ozone on a daily basis. There are two ozone products from OMI, one derived using the traditional TOMS retrieval algorithm and another derived using a Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy algorithm that is being developed to take advantage of the hyperspectral capabilities of OMI. Validation is primarily performed through comparison with a network of Dobson and Brewer ground stations and secondarily through campaigns conducted specifically to validate Aura. Comparison with an ensemble of 76 Northern Hemisphere ground stations shows that OMI‐TOMS total column ozone averages 0.4% higher than the station average, with station‐to‐station standard deviation of ±0.6%. The comparison shows that the OMI‐TOMS ozone was stable over the 2‐year period with no evidence of drift relative to the ground network. The OMI‐DOAS product is also stable but with a 1.1% offset and a seasonal variation of ±2%. During four aircraft validation campaigns using the NASA DC‐8 and WB‐57 aircraft, ozone above the aircraft was measured using an actinic flux instrument and compared with OMI ozone. These comparisons showed agreement within 2% over a broad range of latitude and viewing conditions. Only during the high‐latitude flights did the OMI‐DOAS ozone show the effects of a solar zenith angle dependent error.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multiple symptoms of total ozone recovery inside the Antarctic vortex during austral spring
Pazmiño, A., Godin-Beekmann, S., Hauchecorne, A., Claud, C., Khaykin, S., Goutail, F., Wolfram, E., Salvador, J., & Quel, E. (2018) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-18-7557-2018 · Cited by 64
Persistent extreme ultraviolet irradiance in Antarctica despite the ozone recovery onset
Cordero, R. R., Feron, S., Damiani, A., Redondas, A., Carrasco, J., Sepúlveda, E., Jorquera, J., Fernandoy, F., Llanillo, P., Rowe, P. M., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-05449-8 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- McPeters, R., Kroon, M., Labow, G., Brinksma, E., Balis, D., Petropavlovskikh, I., Veefkind, J. P., Bhartia, P. K., & Levelt, P. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2008-05-02
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- D15
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115577276
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument total column ozone product. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2007jd008802
- The paper
- McPeters, R., Kroon, M., Labow, G., Brinksma, E., Balis, D., Petropavlovskikh, I., Veefkind, J. P., Bhartia, P. K., & Levelt, P. F. (2008). Validation of the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument total column ozone product. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008802
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.