The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An investigation of water uptake on clays minerals using ATR‐FTIR spectroscopy coupled with quartz crystal microbalance measurements
Open accessAbstract
It is becoming increasingly clear that the heterogeneous chemistry of mineral dust aerosol is a function of relative humidity (f(RH)) as water on the surface of the mineral dust particles can enhance or inhibit its reactivity depending on the reaction. Since clay minerals make up a significant component of the mineral dust aerosol, it is important to understand water uptake on this large fraction of dust present in the Earth's atmosphere. In this study, bulk and surface properties of several types and sources of clay minerals are characterized using a variety of techniques, including surface area measurements, attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR‐FTIR) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X‐ray (SEM‐EDX) analysis, X‐Ray diffraction (XRD), Mössbauer spectroscopy, and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). For these well‐characterized clays, ATR‐FTIR spectroscopy is combined with quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) mass measurements to investigate water uptake as a f(RH). Similar measurements were also done for α‐Al 2 O 3 and synthetic NaY zeolite for comparison. Water uptake on the clay minerals, although variable and dependent on both the type and source of the clay, is greater than that found for α‐Al 2 O 3, a metal oxide, and in many cases similar or greater than NaY zeolite, a crystalline porous material. The presence of cations with large hydration energies significantly increases the water uptake capacity for the clay minerals. The atmospheric implications of these results are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mössbauer Spectroscopy of Environmental Materials and Their Industrial Utilization
Murad, E., & Cashion, J. (2004) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9040-2 · Cited by 348
Al-Hosney, H. A., & Grassian, V. H. (2005) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b417872f · Cited by 236
Self-citation
Cited by
Hoose, C., & Möhler, O. (2012) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012 · Cited by 1,227
Hatch, C. D., Wiese, J. S., Crane, C. C., Harris, K. J., Kloss, H. G., & Baltrusaitis, J. (2012) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la2042873 · Cited by 290
Particle Size Controls on Water Adsorption and Condensation Regimes at Mineral Surfaces
Yeşilbaş, M., & Boily, J.-F. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep32136 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Schuttlefield, J. D., Cox, D., & Grassian, V. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2007-11-02
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- D21
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007230074
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An investigation of water uptake on clays minerals using ATR‐FTIR spectroscopy coupled with quartz crystal microbalance measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2007jd008973
- The paper
- Schuttlefield, J. D., Cox, D., & Grassian, V. H. (2007). An investigation of water uptake on clays minerals using ATR‐FTIR spectroscopy coupled with quartz crystal microbalance measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008973
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.