Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 396

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ground‐level nitrogen dioxide concentrations inferred from the satellite‐borne Ozone Monitoring Instrument

Open access
Lamsal, L. N., Martin, R. V., van Donkelaar, A., Steinbacher, M., Celarier, E. A., Bucsela, E., Dunlea, E. J., Pinto, J. P.·2008·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

We present an approach to infer ground‐level nitrogen dioxide (NO 2) concentrations by applying local scaling factors from a global three‐dimensional model (GEOS‐Chem) to tropospheric NO 2 columns retrieved from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) onboard the Aura satellite. Seasonal mean OMI surface NO 2 derived from the standard tropospheric NO 2 data product (Version 1.0.5, Collection 3) varies by more than two orders of magnitude (<0.1–>10 ppbv) over North America. Two ground‐based data sets are used to validate the surface NO 2 estimate and indirectly validate the OMI tropospheric NO 2 retrieval: photochemical steady‐state (PSS) calculations of NO 2 based on in situ NO and O 3 measurements, and measurements from a commercial chemiluminescent NO 2 analyzer equipped with a molybdenum converter. An interference correction algorithm for the latter is developed using laboratory and field measurements and applied using modeled concentrations of the interfering species. The OMI‐derived surface NO 2 mixing ratios are compared with an in situ surface NO 2 data obtained from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Air Quality System (AQS) and Environment Canada's National Air Pollution Surveillance (NAPS) network for 2005 after correcting for the interference in the in situ data. The overall agreement of the OMI‐derived surface NO 2 with the corrected in situ measurements and PSS‐NO 2 is −11–36%. A larger difference in winter/spring than in summer/fall implies a seasonal bias in the OMI NO 2 retrieval. The correlation between the OMI‐derived surface NO 2 and the ground‐based measurements is significant (correlation coefficient up to 0.86) with a tendency for higher correlations in polluted areas. The satellite‐derived data base of ground level NO 2 concentrations could be valuable for assessing exposures of humans and vegetation to NO 2, supplementing the capabilities of the ground‐based networks, and evaluating air quality models and the effectiveness of air quality control strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2007jd009235

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 396

Metadata

Authors
Lamsal, L. N., Martin, R. V., van Donkelaar, A., Steinbacher, M., Celarier, E. A., Bucsela, E., Dunlea, E. J., & Pinto, J. P.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2008-08-27
Volume
113
Issue
D16
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045412781
Cited by
396
References
0
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ground‐level nitrogen dioxide concentrations inferred from the satellite‐borne Ozone Monitoring Instrument. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2007jd009235
The paper
Lamsal, L. N., Martin, R. V., van Donkelaar, A., Steinbacher, M., Celarier, E. A., Bucsela, E., Dunlea, E. J., & Pinto, J. P. (2008). Ground‐level nitrogen dioxide concentrations inferred from the satellite‐borne Ozone Monitoring Instrument. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009235

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.