Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strong spectral variation of biomass smoke light absorption and single scattering albedo observed with a novel dual‐wavelength photoacoustic instrument

Lewis, Kristin, Arnott, William P., Moosmüller, Hans, Wold, Cyle E.·2008·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

A dual‐wavelength photoacoustic instrument operating at 405 and 870 nm was used during the 2006 Fire Lab at Missoula Experiment to measure light scattering and absorption by smoke from the combustion of a variety of biomass fuels. Simultaneous measurements of aerosol light scattering by reciprocal nephelometry within the instrument's acoustic resonator accompany photoacoustic aerosol light absorption measurements. Single scattering albedo values at 405 nm ranging from 0.37 to 0.95 were measured for different fuel types, and the spectral dependence of absorption was quantified using the Ångström exponent of absorption. An absorption Ångström exponent near unity is commonly observed for motor vehicle emission‐generated black carbon aerosol. For biomass smoke, Ångström exponents as high as 3.5 were found in association with smoke having single scattering albedo near unity. The measurements strongly suggest that light‐absorbing organic material is present in wood smoke. A second single‐wavelength photoacoustic instrument with reciprocal nephelometry was used to quantify aerosol scattering and absorption at 532 nm. Absorption Ångström exponents calculated using 532 and 870 nm data were as large as 2.5 for smoke with single scattering albedos near unity. The spectral variation in optical properties provides insight into the differentiation of aerosols from mobile or industrial sources versus those from biomass burning. Optical properties of biomass smokes could be classified by general fuel type such as flowering shrubs versus pine needle litter.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2007jd009699

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Lewis, K., Arnott, W. P., Moosmüller, H., & Wold, C. E.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2008-08-19
Volume
113
Issue
D16
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103826029
Cited by
309
References
41
FWCI
9.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strong spectral variation of biomass smoke light absorption and single scattering albedo observed with a novel dual‐wavelength photoacoustic instrument. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2007jd009699
The paper
Lewis, K., Arnott, W. P., Moosmüller, H., & Wold, C. E. (2008). Strong spectral variation of biomass smoke light absorption and single scattering albedo observed with a novel dual‐wavelength photoacoustic instrument. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009699

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.