The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physics of bodily tides in terrestrial planets and the appropriate scales of dynamical evolution
Open accessAbstract
Any model of tides is based on a specific hypothesis of how lagging depends on the tidal‐flexure frequency χ. For example, Gerstenkorn (1955), MacDonald (1964), and Kaula (1964) assumed constancy of the geometric lag angle δ, while Singer (1968) and Mignard (1979, 1980) asserted constancy of the time lag Δ t. Thus each of these two models was based on a certain law of scaling of the geometric lag: the Gerstenkorn‐MacDonald‐Kaula theory implied that δ ∼ χ0, while the Singer‐Mignard theory postulated δ ∼ χ1. The actual dependence of the geometric lag on the frequency is more complicated and is determined by the rheology of the planet. Besides, each particular functional form of this dependence will unambiguously fix the appropriate form of the frequency dependence of the tidal quality factor, Q(χ). Since at present we know the shape of the function Q(χ), we can reverse our line of reasoning and single out the appropriate actual frequency dependence of the lag, δ(χ): as within the frequency range of our concern Q ∼ χα, α = 0.2–0.4, then δ ∼ χ−α. This dependence turns out to be different from those employed hitherto, and it entails considerable alterations in the timescales of the tide‐generated dynamical evolution. Phobos's fall on Mars is an example we consider.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“More accurate modeling of tidal friction on Phobos has shown that its rate of orbital decay is fully explained by tidal friction (M. Efroimsky & V. Lainey 2007)”
From Phobos is not Hollow (2026) · cites this paper as M. Efroimsky & V. Lainey 2007
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Phobos is not Hollow”
From Phobos is not Hollow (2026) · cites this paper as M. Efroimsky & V. Lainey 2007
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.1029/2004JE002376 · DOI
- 10.1029/2003JE002059 · DOI
- Darwin G. H., 1908, Scientific Papers
- 10.1007/978-94-009-5400-7_17 · DOI
- 10.1007/s000240050199 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02767.x · DOI
- Gerstenkorn H., 1955, Über Gezeitenreibung beim Zweikörperproblem, Z. Astrophys., 36, 245
- 10.1093/mnras/126.3.257 · DOI
- Hanyk L., 1998, Dynamics of the Ice Age Earth: A Modern Perspective, 135
- Hanyk L., 2000, The problem of viscoelastic relaxation of the Earth solved by a matrix eigenvalue approach based on discretization in grid space, Electron. Geosci., 5, 1
- Jacobson R., 1989, The orbits of the satellites of Mars from spacecraft and earthbased observations, Astron. Astrophys., 225, 548
- 10.1007/s000240050195 · DOI
- S.‐i. Karato 2007 Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge U. K.
- 10.1029/RG028i004p00399 · DOI
- 10.1029/RG002i004p00661 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20065466 · DOI
- 10.1029/RG002i003p00467 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00907581 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00899817 · DOI
- 10.1093/mnras/194.2.365 · DOI
- 10.1029/95RG02074 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb04623.x · DOI
- 10.1006/icar.2000.6460 · DOI
- Rainey E. S. G. andO.Aharonson(2006) Estimate of tidal Q of Mars using MOC observations of the shadow of Phobos Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 37th Abstract 2138. (Available athttp://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2006/pdf/2138.pdf).
- 10.1029/2004GL019582 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1968.tb05759.x · DOI
- 10.1029/2004JB003018 · DOI
- 10.1029/97GL00860 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parts, W., & Wright, J. T. (2026) · Research Notes of the AAS · doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ae6817
Metadata
- Authors
- Efroimsky, M., & Lainey, V.
- Affiliations
- United States Naval Observatory (US)
- IMCCE‐Observatoire de Paris UMR 8028 du CNRS Paris France
- ORCID
- Efroimsky, Michael
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- E12
- Pages
- 11 p.
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107047551
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 3.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
- Keywords
- tidal lag, tidal quality factor, terrestrial planets, Phobos, Mars, tidal dissipation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physics of bodily tides in terrestrial planets and the appropriate scales of dynamical evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2007je002908
- The paper
- Efroimsky, M., & Lainey, V. (2007). Physics of bodily tides in terrestrial planets and the appropriate scales of dynamical evolution. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007je002908