The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modeling fluvial incision and transient landscape evolution: Influence of dynamic channel adjustment
Open accessAbstract
Channel geometry exerts a fundamental control on fluvial processes. Recent work has shown that bedrock channel width depends on a number of parameters, including channel slope, and is not solely a function of drainage area as is commonly assumed. The present work represents the first attempt to investigate the consequences of dynamic, gradient‐sensitive channel adjustment for drainage‐basin evolution. We use the Channel‐Hillslope Integrated Landscape Development (CHILD) model to analyze the response of a catchment to a given tectonic perturbation, using, as a template, the topography of a well‐documented catchment in the footwall of an active normal fault in the Apennines (Italy) that is known to be undergoing a transient response to tectonic forcing. We show that the observed transient response can be reproduced to first order with a simple detachment‐limited fluvial incision law. Transient landscape is characterized by gentler gradients and a shorter response time when dynamic channel adjustment is allowed. The differences in predicted channel geometry between the static case (width dependent solely on upstream area) and dynamic case (width dependent on both drainage area and channel slope) lead to contrasting landscape morphologies when integrated at the scale of a whole catchment, particularly in presence of strong tilting and/or pronounced slip‐rate acceleration. Our results emphasize the importance of channel width in controlling fluvial processes and landscape evolution. They stress the need for using a dynamic hydraulic scaling law when modeling landscape evolution, particularly when the relative uplift field is nonuniform.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Expression of active tectonics in erosional landscapes
Kirby, E., & Whipple, K. X. (2012) · Journal of Structural Geology · doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2012.07.009 · Cited by 1,093
Environmental signal propagation in sedimentary systems across timescales
Romans, B. W., Castelltort, S., Covault, J. A., Fildani, A., & Walsh, J. P. (2016) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.07.012 · Cited by 598
The stream power river incision model: evidence, theory and beyond
Lague, D. (2014) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3462 · Cited by 542
Catastrophic flood of the Mediterranean after the Messinian salinity crisis
Garcia-Castellanos, D., Estrada, F., Jiménez-Munt, I., Gorini, C., Fernàndez, M., Vergés, J., & De Vicente, R. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08555 · Cited by 502
Global analysis of the stream power law parameters based on worldwide 10Be denudation rates
Harel, M.-A., Mudd, S. M., & Attal, M. (2016) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.05.035 · Cited by 334
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Attal, M., Tucker, G. E., Whittaker, A. C., Cowie, P. A., & Roberts, G. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2008-08-05
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- F3
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118807611
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling fluvial incision and transient landscape evolution: Influence of dynamic channel adjustment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2007jf000893
- The paper
- Attal, M., Tucker, G. E., Whittaker, A. C., Cowie, P. A., & Roberts, G. P. (2008). Modeling fluvial incision and transient landscape evolution: Influence of dynamic channel adjustment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jf000893
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.