The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dimensions of dry snow slab avalanches from field measurements
Open accessAbstract
Dry slab avalanches release by a sequence of propagating fractures. In this paper, I provide field measurements of the important length parameters resulting from fractures for hundreds fallen slabs including depth, length, and width. The field data show wide variations in these parameters. Probability plots of all dimensions (length, width, and depth) suggest they approximately obey log normal probability density functions. Given slab dimensions, two applications are considered on the basis of the field data. These applications are: (1) Estimates of total fracture energy consumed around the perimeter of the slab are given, where it is presumed fracture is mostly mode I, and along the base (weak layer) of the slab, where shear fracture (mode II and III) is expected. For average characteristic dimensions, the analysis suggests that energy consumed on the perimeter is somewhat less than in the weak layer. Even though fracture energy around the perimeter is expected to be higher than in the weak layer, the larger area fractured in shear at the base of the slab compared to area fractured in tension around the perimeter results in a comparable amount of total energy needed around the perimeter. (2) Approximate estimates of avalanche mass for average characteristic dimensions based on slab depth D (the only length possibly known prior to avalanching) are made. The mass is considered related to destructive potential and simple guidelines are given to estimate mass in relation to D with validation by considering concurrent size and estimates of D by mountain guides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The calculated B = 8.8 m is consistent with observed B/l_t ratios and comparable to the width of the cut b = 6.5-7.5 m.
“consistent with the observed B=l t ratios 34 and comparable to the width of the cut b=6.5-7.5 m (for a 4.5 m long tent, the cut had to be around 1.0-1.5 m longer on each side).”
From Mechanisms of slab avalanche release and impact in the Dyatlov Pass incident in 1959 (2021) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1029/2002JB001884 · DOI
- Benjamin J. R., 1970, Probability, Statistics and Decision for Civil Engineers
- Brown C. B., 1972, Slab avalanching and the state of stress in fallen snow, J. Geophys. Res., 78, 4950
- 10.1017/CBO9780511546761 · DOI
- Gauthier D.(2007) A practical field test for fracture propagation and arrest in weak snowpack layers in relation to slab avalanche release Ph.D. thesis 302 pp. Dep. of Civil Eng. Univ. of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.
- Jamieson J. B. andC. D.Johnston(1990) The width of unconfined slab avalanches based on field measurements of slab properties paper presented atInternational Snow Science Workshop Int. Snow Sci. Workshop Comm. Bigfork Montana 9 – 13 October .
- 10.1139/t92-007 · DOI
- 10.1029/JB084iB07p03519 · DOI
- 10.1029/JB086iB11p10783 · DOI
- 10.1029/2006GL028238 · DOI
- McClung D. M., 2006, The Avalanche Handbook
- 10.1098/rspa.1973.0040 · DOI
- Paterson S., 1994, The Physics of Glaciers
- Perla R. I.(1971) The slab avalanche Ph.D. thesis 101 pp. Dep. of Meteorol. Univ. of Utah Salt Lake City.
- 10.1139/t77-021 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0165-232X(01)00037-4 · DOI
- 10.3189/172756404781814906 · DOI
- Sovilla B.(2004) Field experiments and numerical modelling of mass entrainment and deposition processes in snow avalanches Ph.D. dissertation 191 pp. Swiss Fed. Inst. of Technol. Zurich Switzerland.
- 10.1029/2005JF000391 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mechanisms of slab avalanche release and impact in the Dyatlov Pass incident in 1959
Gaume, J., & Puzrin, A. M. (2021) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-020-00081-8 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- McClung, D. M.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- McClung, D. M.
- ORCID
- McClung, D. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2009-01-23
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- F1
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1991395763
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 14.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Landslides and related hazards
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Cryospheric studies and observations
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Tree Root and Stability Studies
- Keywords
- dry-snow slab avalanches, fracture energy, lognormal distribution, weak layer, shear fracture, mode I fracture, slab depth, avalanche size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review