Cited by 31Landslides and related hazardsCryospheric studies and observationsTree Root and Stability Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dimensions of dry snow slab avalanches from field measurements

Open access
McClung, D. M.·2009·Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface

Abstract

Dry slab avalanches release by a sequence of propagating fractures. In this paper, I provide field measurements of the important length parameters resulting from fractures for hundreds fallen slabs including depth, length, and width. The field data show wide variations in these parameters. Probability plots of all dimensions (length, width, and depth) suggest they approximately obey log normal probability density functions. Given slab dimensions, two applications are considered on the basis of the field data. These applications are: (1) Estimates of total fracture energy consumed around the perimeter of the slab are given, where it is presumed fracture is mostly mode I, and along the base (weak layer) of the slab, where shear fracture (mode II and III) is expected. For average characteristic dimensions, the analysis suggests that energy consumed on the perimeter is somewhat less than in the weak layer. Even though fracture energy around the perimeter is expected to be higher than in the weak layer, the larger area fractured in shear at the base of the slab compared to area fractured in tension around the perimeter results in a comparable amount of total energy needed around the perimeter. (2) Approximate estimates of avalanche mass for average characteristic dimensions based on slab depth D (the only length possibly known prior to avalanching) are made. The mass is considered related to destructive potential and simple guidelines are given to estimate mass in relation to D with validation by considering concurrent size and estimates of D by mountain guides.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2007jf000941

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The calculated B = 8.8 m is consistent with observed B/l_t ratios and comparable to the width of the cut b = 6.5-7.5 m.

    “consistent with the observed B=l t ratios 34 and comparable to the width of the cut b=6.5-7.5 m (for a 4.5 m long tent, the cut had to be around 1.0-1.5 m longer on each side).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1029/2002JB001884 · DOI
  2. Benjamin J. R., 1970, Probability, Statistics and Decision for Civil Engineers
  3. Brown C. B., 1972, Slab avalanching and the state of stress in fallen snow, J. Geophys. Res., 78, 4950
  4. 10.1017/CBO9780511546761 · DOI
  5. Gauthier D.(2007) A practical field test for fracture propagation and arrest in weak snowpack layers in relation to slab avalanche release Ph.D. thesis 302 pp. Dep. of Civil Eng. Univ. of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.
  6. Jamieson J. B. andC. D.Johnston(1990) The width of unconfined slab avalanches based on field measurements of slab properties paper presented atInternational Snow Science Workshop Int. Snow Sci. Workshop Comm. Bigfork Montana 9 – 13 October .
  7. 10.1139/t92-007 · DOI
  8. 10.1029/JB084iB07p03519 · DOI
  9. 10.1029/JB086iB11p10783 · DOI
  10. 10.1029/2006GL028238 · DOI
  11. McClung D. M., 2006, The Avalanche Handbook
  12. 10.1098/rspa.1973.0040 · DOI
  13. Paterson S., 1994, The Physics of Glaciers
  14. Perla R. I.(1971) The slab avalanche Ph.D. thesis 101 pp. Dep. of Meteorol. Univ. of Utah Salt Lake City.
  15. 10.1139/t77-021 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0165-232X(01)00037-4 · DOI
  17. 10.3189/172756404781814906 · DOI
  18. Sovilla B.(2004) Field experiments and numerical modelling of mass entrainment and deposition processes in snow avalanches Ph.D. dissertation 191 pp. Swiss Fed. Inst. of Technol. Zurich Switzerland.
  19. 10.1029/2005JF000391 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McClung, D. M.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
McClung, D. M.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
Published
2009-01-23
Volume
114
Issue
F1
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991395763
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
14.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Landslides and related hazards
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Tree Root and Stability Studies
Keywords
dry-snow slab avalanches, fracture energy, lognormal distribution, weak layer, shear fracture, mode I fracture, slab depth, avalanche size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review