The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are tropical forests near a high temperature threshold?
Open accessAbstract
We used leaf gas exchange, sap flow, and eddy covariance measurements to investigate whether high temperature substantially limits CO 2 uptake at the LBA‐ECO (Large‐scale Biosphere‐Atmosphere) km‐83 tropical forest site in Brazil. Leaf‐level temperature‐photosynthesis curves, and comparisons of whole‐canopy net ecosystem CO 2 exchange (NEE) with air temperature, showed that CO 2 uptake declined sharply during warm periods. Observations of ambient leaf microclimate showed that leaves oscillate between two states: a cool, dimly lit stage and a hot, brightly illuminated stage where leaf temperatures are often greater than 35°C. The leaf‐level rates of photosynthesis decreased when shaded leaves (∼ambient air temperature and < 500 μ mol m−2 s−1) were transferred into a prewarmed, brightly illuminated chamber (35° to 38°C and 1000 μ mol m−2 s−1), coincident with increased leaf temperature, increased evaporative demand, and stomatal closure. The rates of whole‐canopy CO 2 uptake calculated at 5‐min intervals increased initially at the onset of sunny periods that followed extended cloudy periods, but then decreased as the sunlight continued, leaf temperature and evaporative demand increased, and canopy conductance decreased. The forest at km‐83 appears to be close to a high temperature threshold, above which CO 2 uptake drops sharply. This sensitivity results in part from the covariance between leaf temperature and leaf illumination; the brightly illuminated leaves that contribute disproportionately to canopy photosynthesis are warmed to the point that leaf gas exchange is curtailed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components
Field, C. B., Behrenfeld, M. J., Randerson, J. T., & Falkowski, P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.237 · Cited by 6,371
Cited by
Sensitivity of global terrestrial ecosystems to climate variability
Seddon, A. W. R., Macias-Fauria, M., Long, P. R., Benz, D., & Willis, K. J. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16986 · Cited by 1,373
LASSLOP, G., REICHSTEIN, M., PAPALE, D., RICHARDSON, A. D., ARNETH, A., BARR, A., STOY, P., & WOHLFAHRT, G. (2010) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02041.x · Cited by 1,156
Frank, D., Reichstein, M., Bahn, M., Thonicke, K., Frank, D., Mahecha, M. D., Smith, P., van der Velde, M., Vicca, S., Babst, F., et al. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12916 · Cited by 1,037
Interannual variation of terrestrial carbon cycle: Issues and perspectives
Piao, S., Wang, X., Wang, K., Li, X., Bastos, A., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Friedlingstein, P., & Sitch, S. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14884 · Cited by 486
Leaf development and demography explain photosynthetic seasonality in Amazon evergreen forests
Wu, J., Albert, L. P., Lopes, A. P., Restrepo-Coupe, N., Hayek, M., Wiedemann, K. T., Guan, K., Stark, S. C., Christoffersen, B., Prohaska, N., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad5068 · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Doughty, C. E., & Goulden, M. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- G1
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145513189
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are tropical forests near a high temperature threshold? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2007jg000632
- The paper
- Doughty, C. E., & Goulden, M. L. (2008). Are tropical forests near a high temperature threshold? Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jg000632
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.