The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatial proximity, physical similarity, regression and ungaged catchments: A comparison of regionalization approaches based on 913 French catchments
Abstract
Given the contradictory results from recent studies, this paper compares classical regionalization schemes of catchment model parameters over the wide range of hydroclimates found in France. To ensure the generality of the conclusions, we used two lumped rainfall‐runoff models applied to daily data over a large set of 913 French catchments. Three types of approaches were considered: regionalization using regression, regionalization based on spatial proximity and regionalization based on physical similarity. This comparison shows that in France, where a dense network of gauging stations is available, spatial proximity provides the best regionalization solution. The regression approach is the least satisfactory, with results very close to those obtained using one median parameter set for the whole country. The physical similarity approach is intermediary. However, the results obtained with these three methods lag far behind those obtained by full model calibration. Our results also show that some improvement could be made by combining spatial proximity and physical similarity, and that there is still considerable room for progress in the field of ungaged catchment modeling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BEVEN, K. J., & KIRKBY, M. J. (1979) · Hydrological Sciences Bulletin · doi:10.1080/02626667909491834 · Cited by 6,670
Beven, K., & Freer, J. (2001) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(01)00421-8 · Cited by 2,189
Cited by
A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review
Hrachowitz, M., Savenije, H. H. G., Blöschl, G., McDonnell, J. J., Sivapalan, M., Pomeroy, J. W., Arheimer, B., Blume, T., Clark, M. P., Ehret, U., et al. (2013) · Hydrological Sciences Journal · doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.803183 · Cited by 1,295
Sawicz, K., Wagener, T., Sivapalan, M., Troch, P. A., & Carrillo, G. (2011) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-15-2895-2011 · Cited by 549
Coron, L., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Lerat, J., Vaze, J., Bourqui, M., & Hendrickx, F. (2012) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2011wr011721 · Cited by 461
Self-citationJiang, S., Zheng, Y., & Solomatine, D. (2020) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2020gl088229 · Cited by 365
Guo, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., & Wang, Z. (2021) · WIREs Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1487 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Oudin, L., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Michel, C., & Le Moine, N.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1576008153
- Cited by
- 627
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial proximity, physical similarity, regression and ungaged catchments: A comparison of regionalization approaches based on 913 French catchments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2007wr006240
- The paper
- Oudin, L., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Michel, C., & Le Moine, N. (2008). Spatial proximity, physical similarity, regression and ungaged catchments: A comparison of regionalization approaches based on 913 French catchments. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007wr006240
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.