The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stratospheric variability and tropospheric ozone
Open accessAbstract
Changes in the stratosphere‐troposphere exchange (STE) of ozone over the last few decades have altered the tropospheric ozone abundance and are likely to continue doing so in the coming century as climate changes. Combining an updated linearized stratospheric ozone chemistry (Linoz v2) with parameterized polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) chemistry, a 5‐year (2001–2005) sequence of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) meteorology data, and the University of California, Irvine (UCI) chemistry transport model (CTM), we examined variations in STE O 3 flux and how it perturbs tropospheric O 3. Our estimate for the current STE ozone flux is 290 Tg/a in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) and 225 Tg/a in the Southern Hemisphere (SH). The 2001–2005 interannual root‐mean‐square (RMS) variability is 25 Tg/a for the NH and 30 Tg/a for the SH. STE drives a seasonal peak‐to‐peak NH variability in tropospheric ozone of about 7–8 Dobson unit (DU). Of the interannual STE variance, 20% and 45% can be explained by the quasi‐biennial oscillation (QBO) in the NH and SH, respectively. The CTM matches the observed QBO variations in total column ozone, and the STE O 3 flux shows negative anomalies over the midlatitudes during the easterly phases of the QBO. When the observed column ozone depletion from 1979 to 2004 is modeled with Linoz v2, we predicted STE reductions of at most 10% in the NH, corresponding to a mean decrease of 1 ppb in tropospheric O 3.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Young, P. J., Naik, V., Fiore, A. M., Gaudel, A., Guo, J., Lin, M. Y., Neu, J. L., Parrish, D. D., Rieder, H. E., Schnell, J. L., et al. (2018) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.265 · Cited by 444
Long‐term ozone changes and associated climate impacts in CMIP5 simulations
Eyring, V., Arblaster, J. M., Cionni, I., Sedláček, J., Perlwitz, J., Young, P. J., Bekki, S., Bergmann, D., Cameron‐Smith, P., Collins, W. J., et al. (2013) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/jgrd.50316 · Cited by 324
Holmes, C. D., Prather, M. J., Søvde, O. A., & Myhre, G. (2013) · Atmospheric chemistry and physics · doi:10.5194/acp-13-285-2013 · Cited by 232
Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report
Archibald, A. T., Neu, J. L., Elshorbany, Y. F., Cooper, O. R., Young, P. J., Akiyoshi, H., Cox, R. A., Coyle, M., Derwent, R. G., Deushi, M., et al. (2020) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.2020.034 · Cited by 239
Evaluating stratospheric ozone and water vapour changes in CMIP6 models from 1850 to 2100
Keeble, J., Hassler, B., Banerjee, A., Checa-Garcia, R., Chiodo, G., Davis, S., Eyring, V., Griffiths, P. T., Morgenstern, O., Nowack, P., et al. (2021) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-21-5015-2021 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Hsu, J., & Prather, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2009-03-17
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- D6
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023090775
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stratospheric variability and tropospheric ozone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2008jd010942
- The paper
- Hsu, J., & Prather, M. J. (2009). Stratospheric variability and tropospheric ozone. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010942
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.