The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Numerical and analytical models of cosmogenic radionuclide dynamics in landslide‐dominated drainage basins
Abstract
In many tectonically active regions on Earth, landslides dominate sediment delivery to channels. While cosmogenic radionuclides (CRN) represent a valuable tool to document basin‐averaged erosion rates, a better understanding of CRN dynamics in these systems is required before erosion rates can be reliably inferred from CRN concentrations. The stochastic nature of landslides results in variability of CRN concentrations in both alluvial and hillslope samples that is both difficult to document and poorly understood. To guide sampling strategies, we developed a 2‐D plan view model to simulate the influence of landslides on CRN dynamics. We employ a sediment mixing model, in which concentrations of CRNs from material eroded by both landslides and steady processes are combined to evaluate how best to infer erosion rates from CRN concentrations. This model is further used to test a new analytical solution for the distribution of CRN concentrations on hillslopes in a landslide‐prone system. Results suggest that for landscapes dominated by deep (>5 m) landslides, only large drainage basins (≥100 km 2) provide consistently reliable estimates of erosion rates from CRN concentrations. For landscapes dominated by shallow landslides (0.7–2 m), smaller basins can produce reliable estimates. Results further suggest that the distribution of concentrations from hillslope samples could be used to deduce the relative contribution of material derived from landslide and steady processes. These findings underscore the need to consider carefully the sources of natural variability in sampling and analyzing CRNs; if properly done, the variability can reveal useful information about geomorphic processes in landslide‐prone areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Roering, J. J., Kirchner, J. W., & Dietrich, W. E. (1999) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/1998wr900090 · Cited by 705
Cited by
Landscape form and millennial erosion rates in the San Gabriel Mountains, CA
DiBiase, R. A., Whipple, K. X., Heimsath, A. M., & Ouimet, W. B. (2010) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2009.10.036 · Cited by 548
The stream power river incision model: evidence, theory and beyond
Lague, D. (2014) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3462 · Cited by 542
Cyr, A. J., Granger, D. E., Olivetti, V., & Molin, P. (2010) · Lithosphere · doi:10.1130/l96.1 · Cited by 191
Metadata
- Authors
- Yanites, B. J., Tucker, G. E., & Anderson, R. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2009-01-23
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- F1
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010036448
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Numerical and analytical models of cosmogenic radionuclide dynamics in landslide‐dominated drainage basins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2008jf001088
- The paper
- Yanites, B. J., Tucker, G. E., & Anderson, R. S. (2009). Numerical and analytical models of cosmogenic radionuclide dynamics in landslide‐dominated drainage basins. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jf001088
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.