Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 203

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Numerical and analytical models of cosmogenic radionuclide dynamics in landslide‐dominated drainage basins

Yanites, Brian J., Tucker, Gregory E., Anderson, Robert S.·2009·Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface

Abstract

In many tectonically active regions on Earth, landslides dominate sediment delivery to channels. While cosmogenic radionuclides (CRN) represent a valuable tool to document basin‐averaged erosion rates, a better understanding of CRN dynamics in these systems is required before erosion rates can be reliably inferred from CRN concentrations. The stochastic nature of landslides results in variability of CRN concentrations in both alluvial and hillslope samples that is both difficult to document and poorly understood. To guide sampling strategies, we developed a 2‐D plan view model to simulate the influence of landslides on CRN dynamics. We employ a sediment mixing model, in which concentrations of CRNs from material eroded by both landslides and steady processes are combined to evaluate how best to infer erosion rates from CRN concentrations. This model is further used to test a new analytical solution for the distribution of CRN concentrations on hillslopes in a landslide‐prone system. Results suggest that for landscapes dominated by deep (>5 m) landslides, only large drainage basins (≥100 km 2) provide consistently reliable estimates of erosion rates from CRN concentrations. For landscapes dominated by shallow landslides (0.7–2 m), smaller basins can produce reliable estimates. Results further suggest that the distribution of concentrations from hillslope samples could be used to deduce the relative contribution of material derived from landslide and steady processes. These findings underscore the need to consider carefully the sources of natural variability in sampling and analyzing CRNs; if properly done, the variability can reveal useful information about geomorphic processes in landslide‐prone areas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2008jf001088

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 203

Metadata

Authors
Yanites, B. J., Tucker, G. E., & Anderson, R. S.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
Published
2009-01-23
Volume
114
Issue
F1
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010036448
Cited by
203
References
1
FWCI
27.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Numerical and analytical models of cosmogenic radionuclide dynamics in landslide‐dominated drainage basins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2008jf001088
The paper
Yanites, B. J., Tucker, G. E., & Anderson, R. S. (2009). Numerical and analytical models of cosmogenic radionuclide dynamics in landslide‐dominated drainage basins. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jf001088

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.