The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evolution of vertical knickpoints (waterfalls) with resistant caprock: Insights from numerical modeling
Open accessAbstract
Vertical knickpoints (waterfalls) mark a prominent process transition zone whose governing mechanics is not represented by conventional stream power incision models. We examine the evolution of vertical knickpoints with resistant caprock utilizing numerical simulations that explicitly represent (1) face failure mechanisms, (2) flow acceleration and amplified erosion above a knickpoint lip, (3) deposition and removal of coarse debris below the knickpoint, and (4) base level lowering or tectonic uplift rates. Our model demonstrates that knickpoint retreat rate, where the subcaprock is weak or vertically jointed and base level fall rates are steady, is likely to become tied to downstream conditions and equal to the downstream incision rate divided by channel gradient. Mechanically, this coupling occurs where the subcaprock reaches a threshold height for failure in shear or buckling or where the weathering rate of the subcaprock is higher than the downstream incision wave velocity (Vi_ds). The height of the subcaprock face can influence its gravitational stability and the knickpoint lateral erosion rate and lead to a feedback between downstream incision and retreat rate. Retreat rate can be lower than Vi_ds during transients, which could be long (>10 6 years) and set by the weathering rate of the subcaprock or influenced by lag debris evacuation. Key variables other than discharge can be important in setting retreat rates. These include base level lowering rate, the rock strength of stratigraphic units downstream of the knickpoint, and the size and flux of sediment contributed from above the knickpoint or from the canyon walls. Two types of oversteepened reaches can form in association with a vertical knickpoint: (1) an upstream, free fall‐induced, oversteepened reach whose length is longer than the flow acceleration zone and (2) a downstream coarse debris‐induced oversteepened reach. Although the model was constructed with caprock‐type knickpoints in mind, some of its elements and insights are also relevant to homogenous substrates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Expression of active tectonics in erosional landscapes
Kirby, E., & Whipple, K. X. (2012) · Journal of Structural Geology · doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2012.07.009 · Cited by 1,093
Self-citationThe stream power river incision model: evidence, theory and beyond
Lague, D. (2014) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3462 · Cited by 542
Whipple, K. X., DiBiase, R. A., & Crosby, B. T. (2013) · Treatise on Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374739-6.00254-2 · Cited by 190
Self-citationCharacterization of slow slip rate faults in humid areas: Cimandiri fault zone, Indonesia
Marliyani, G. I., Arrowsmith, J. R., & Whipple, K. X. (2016) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface · doi:10.1002/2016jf003846 · Cited by 77
Self-citationBoulton, S. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Earth Science · doi:10.3389/feart.2020.00010 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Haviv, I., Enzel, Y., Whipple, K. X., Zilberman, E., Matmon, A., Stone, J., & Fifield, K. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2010-08-24
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- F3
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995521250
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of vertical knickpoints (waterfalls) with resistant caprock: Insights from numerical modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2008jf001187
- The paper
- Haviv, I., Enzel, Y., Whipple, K. X., Zilberman, E., Matmon, A., Stone, J., & Fifield, K. L. (2010). Evolution of vertical knickpoints (waterfalls) with resistant caprock: Insights from numerical modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jf001187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.