The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydrological trend analysis in the Yellow River basin using a distributed hydrological model
Abstract
The hydrological cycle has been highly influenced by climate change and human activities, and it is significant for analyzing the hydrological trends that occurred in past decades in order to understand past changes and to predict future trends. The water crisis of the Yellow River basin has drawn much attention from around the world, especially the drying up of the main river along the lower reaches during the 1990s. By incorporating historical meteorological data and available geographic information related to the conditions of the landscape, a distributed hydrological model has been employed to simulate the natural runoff without consideration of artificial water intake. On the basis of the data observed and the results simulated by the model, the hydrological trends have been analyzed quantitatively for evaluating the impact from climate change and human activity. It is found that the simulated natural runoff follows a similar trend as the precipitation in the entire area being studied during the last half century, and this implies that changes in the natural runoff are mainly controlled by the climate change rather than land use change. Changes in actual evapotranspiration upstream of the Lanzhou gauge are controlled by changes in both precipitation and potential evaporation, while changes of actual evapotranspiration downstream of the Lanzhou gauge are controlled mainly by the changes in precipitation. The difference between the annual observed runoff and the simulated runoff indicates that there is little artificial water consumption upstream of the Lanzhou gauge, but the artificial water consumption becomes larger downstream of the Lanzhou gauge. The artificial water consumption shows a significant increasing trend during the past 50 years and is the main cause of the drying up of the Yellow River. However, in contrast to the common perception that the serious drying up downstream of the Yellow River during the 1990s is caused by the rapid increase of artificial water consumption during the same period, it has been found that the main cause of this aggravation is the drier climate that has existed since the 1990s. The main reason that the drying‐up situation became better in the 21st century is because of the enhanced water resources management since 2000.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Closed‐form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils
van Genuchten, M. T. (1980) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x · Cited by 27,578
Cited by
Yu, M., Li, Q., Hayes, M. J., Svoboda, M. D., & Heim, R. R. (2014) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.3701 · Cited by 585
Soil Moisture Drought in China, 1950–2006
Wang, A., Lettenmaier, D. P., & Sheffield, J. (2011) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/2011jcli3733.1 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Authors
- Cong, Z., Yang, D., Gao, B., Yang, H., & Hu, H.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2009-02-24
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2044935105
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrological trend analysis in the Yellow River basin using a distributed hydrological model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2008wr006852
- The paper
- Cong, Z., Yang, D., Gao, B., Yang, H., & Hu, H. (2009). Hydrological trend analysis in the Yellow River basin using a distributed hydrological model. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008wr006852
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.