The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A decentralized optimization algorithm for multiagent system–based watershed management
Abstract
A watershed can be simulated as a multiagent system (MAS) composed of spatially distributed land and water users (agents) within a common defined environment. The watershed system is characterized by distributed decision processes at the agent level with a coordination mechanism organizing the interactions among individual decision processes at the system level. This paper presents a decentralized (distributed) optimization method known as constraint‐based reasoning, which allows individual agents in an MAS to optimize their behaviors over various alternatives. The method incorporates the optimization of all agents' objectives through an interaction scheme, in which the i th agent optimizes its objective with a selected priority for collaboration and forwards the solution and consequences to all agents that interact with it. Agents are allowed to determine how important their own objectives are in comparison with the constraints, using a local interest factor (βi). A large βi value indicates a selfish agent who puts high priority on its own benefit and ignores collaboration requirements. This bottom‐up problem‐solving approach mimics real‐world watershed management problems better than conventional “top‐down” optimization methods in which it is assumed that individual agents will completely comply with any recommendations that the coordinator makes. The method is applied to a steady state hypothetical watershed with three off‐stream human agents, one in‐stream human agent (reservoir), and two ecological agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Complexity of coupled human and natural systems
Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., Folke, C., Moran, E., Pell, A. N., Deadman, P., Kratz, T., Lubchenco, J., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1144004 · Cited by 3,624
Cited by
Many objective robust decision making for complex environmental systems undergoing change
Kasprzyk, J. R., Nataraj, S., Reed, P. M., & Lempert, R. J. (2013) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.12.007 · Cited by 508
Global change and the groundwater management challenge
Gorelick, S. M., & Zheng, C. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2014wr016825 · Cited by 507
Gendered perspectives of ecosystem services: a systematic review
Yang, Y. C. E., Passarelli, S., Lovell, R. J., & Ringler, C. (2018) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.015 · Cited by 142
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Y. E., Cai, X., & Stipanović, D. M.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1730771398
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A decentralized optimization algorithm for multiagent system–based watershed management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2008wr007634
- The paper
- Yang, Y. E., Cai, X., & Stipanović, D. M. (2009). A decentralized optimization algorithm for multiagent system–based watershed management. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008wr007634
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.